I’m a lifelong Labour member, but we should all vote tactically to stop Johnson

I abhor their record in office but I'm also a pragmatist.

This weekend, I did something I’ve never done before – and something I don’t intend on ever doing again after this Thursday – I campaigned for a Liberal Democrat candidate.

I’ve been a member of the Labour Party for pretty much all my adult life. I was Campaigns Officer for my University Labour Club, I’ve campaigned in multiple elections for Labour candidates and I’ve always voted Labour.

I was always proud to be part of a party which introduced the NHS, the minimum wage, Sure Start centres, civil partnerships and so many progressive advances for working class people in the UK.

So to do anything other than full-throatedly support Labour, as I have been over the last few weeks, felt akin to driving on the wrong side of the road. The actions are all the same, but the principles have totally changed.

But there is a reason why – this General Election is different.

Usually, elections decide the direction of a country for 5 years. This one will determine our future for a generation.

This election is about whether or not to give Boris Johnson the majority he craves to deliver his Brexit Deal.

The hard truth is that the only way to do that in some places is to vote tactically for candidates who might not be from the same party as you.

It means that, for those of us campaigning for a Final Say referendum, we’ve had to change how we work.

For our Future’ Sake (FFS) – the youth and student-led movement which has been campaigning for a Final Say for the last two years – has always been cross-party.

So when the General Election was called, we were comfortable proceeding in that spirit.

We had chosen 17 key seats with high proportions of young people and students, who can really make the difference.

Not just in those areas, but all across the UK, we know that just over 40,000 tactical votes is the difference between a devastating Johnson majority, or a hung parliament.

A Johnson majority won’t just ensure his botched Brexit Deal passes Parliament next month: it’ll give him the mandate to deliver the most regressive agenda pursued by a British Prime Minister in generations.

So as difficult as this is to hear (and as difficult as it is to say):

If I lived in Stirling, I’d be voting for the SNP candidate
If I was from St Albans, I’d be voting Liberal Democrat candidate
If I was in Belfast South, I’d be voting SDLP candidate

In those constituencies, and many more besides, the Labour Party either isn’t running or simply won’t win.

We can argue about the reasons why – the vile anti-semitism that is within my party, the unpopularity of Jeremy Corbyn with the wider public, or our dithering over Brexit for the last 3 years.

I know that saying this may get me thrown out of my party. I also know it leaves me open to charges of being a supporter of another party – I’m not. I’m a Democratic Socialist, a Unionist and someone who abhors the Liberal Democrats’ record in the coalition.

But I’m also a pragmatist.

We need to stop Johnson getting the majority that he desperately wants. On 12th December, that means voting with our heads as well as our hearts, and voting tactically.

Richard Brooks is the head of communications at For Our Future’s Sake, a young people & student-led anti Brexit campaign

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

5 Responses to “I’m a lifelong Labour member, but we should all vote tactically to stop Johnson”

  1. DiggerUK

    Party rules are quite clear. If you wish to be so cavalier about your membership, fine, it’s your membership.
    In Irish seats with no Labour candidates there is usually the SDLP. I know of no seat in Scotland, Wales or England without a Labour candidate.

    Tactical voting is of no consequence in the greater scheme of things, never has been.

    You’re a Party member, and rules are rules. Best stick with them.

    Remember, the shit part of democracy is the sad fact that not everybody gets what they vote for. Just live with that fact comrade…_

  2. Joe

    Most of our major problems have a root cause in uncontrolled immigration: Housing, NHS, etc.

    – Every year for the last five years, 747,000 National Insurance numbers have been issued to immigrants.
    – 6.5 million immigrants have registered with a GP.
    – In 10 years, 8 million immigrants have swamped Britain.

    We have an immigration & overpopulation crisis & Brits are suffering

  3. Tom Sacold

    Vote for what you believe in.

    A vote for the Lib Dems is a vote for capitalism. We will never have real socialism if Labour supporters vote Lib Dem.

  4. I’m a lifelong Labour member, but we should all vote tactically to stop Johnson - Politics Highlight - News from the Left and Right

    […] 10 December 2019Politics Highlight I abhor their record in office but I’m also a pragmatist. Author: Richard Brooks | Source […]

  5. Julia Gibb

    The problem is FPTP.

    We should all vote for the party aligned to our views and Westminster Parties will have to learn to work together. Why should we compromise our views,values and beliefs to “correct” the system.

    However too late for this election so I would say vote for the candidate best placed to stop Tory candidates. The thought of Boris with a majority at Westminster terrifies me.

Comments are closed.