The cuts Theresa May is planning will absolutely decimate London’s police force

The impact is stark yet simple: crime is going up


No cuts to the frontline. That’s what was promised when Theresa May set out her first round of policing cuts in 2010’s spending review. Since then in London we’ve seen 1,414 police officers, 2,718 PCSOs and 63 police stations axed.

It seems clear the home secretary’s definition of frontline is quite a world apart from the rest of us.

Fast forward to 2015 and already concern is mounting about the cuts to be unveiled in the next spending review penned in for 25 November. In 2010 the Met, which is also the lead force for counter-terrorism and many other national crimes, saw its budget cut by 20 per cent or roughly £600m.

The latest estimates from the Police and Crime Commissioners Treasurers’ Society (PACCTS) seen by the Guardian newspaper reportedly predict further cuts of up to 43 per cent to the Met’s budget by 2020. That would mean between 2010 and 2020 the Met had lost over half its funding.

With much of the low hanging fruit now gone, the next round of cuts is going to hurt more than ever. Up until now the debate has centred on whether we can maintain police numbers at current levels, around 32,000. With around 80 per cent of the Met’s budget spent on staffing costs it’s clear this scale of cut would blow that ambition out of the water.

There is no doubt that cuts of 43 per cent would absolutely decimate London’s police force. It’s inconceivable that the Metropolitan police would be able to survive in its current form if this scale of ‘savings’ were enforced.

The comparatively limited 20 per cent cuts already passed down from government have been debilitating. It’s not just a vast number of individual officers we’ve already lost but also the ability to do things the public wholeheartedly support. One consequence has been the demise of local neighbourhood policing in favour of a cheaper area-based approach, with teams of six cut down to only two officers in each ward.

The impact is stark yet simple: crime is going up. Over the last 12 months overall crime has risen by 3.5 per cent. That’s an additional 24,343 crimes to deal with. This hides within it some worrying trends. Whilst crimes like burglary are down, some of the most serious crimes, for example violent offences including stabbings, have spiked 24 per cent in the last year, that’s an additional 40,748 violent offences.

These are the kinds of crimes which frontline local knowledge and intelligence are key to preventing.

Add on to this a soaring population and the dramatic increase in the reporting of other crimes like rape and sexual offences, and it’s clear that if anything the Met needs more resources, not less.

The PACCTS predicted cuts of 43 per cent to the Met and large cuts to other urban forces have led to threats of legal action from the West Midlands and Northumbria Police and Crime Commissioners. Unless the home secretary is straight with police forces the nervous storm clouds will continue to grow.

The government’s decision to consult on the ‘principles’ of a new funding formula, the process by which the Home Office decide which force gets what, without giving any indications of what the changes would mean in practice tells you a lot. Nobody, not even the Home Office, wants to face up to the true scale of the pain to come.

With crime beginning to rise in the capital, and demands from national duties such as counter-terrorism continuing to grow, it’s not clear how the much of the Met’s slimmed down budget will actually be left to police the streets of the capital. This cannot, and should not, be acceptable to the home secretary, whatever her questionable definition of ‘frontline’.

Joanne McCartney AM is Labour’s London Assembly policing spokesperson

Want to read more posts like this? Then *sign-up to Look Left* and make sure you have the facts to rebut right-wing spin 

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

9 Responses to “The cuts Theresa May is planning will absolutely decimate London’s police force”

  1. Mick

    Waitaminute, I thought you lefties HATED having so many ‘pigs’ about, not to mention wanting treacle-soft.., er, sensible reform of conviction rates!

    And with even government departments expected to cut expenditure by 40%, it’s no special target, as this article suggests. Gutting the police works contrary to conventional Tory mentalities.

  2. stevep

    “Tory” and “Mentalities” in the same sentence.
    Naw, it presents too easy a target even for a left-winger like me!

  3. Mick

    What, there are times when such things DON’T make you wet yourself?

  4. stevep

    I find amusement in lots of things:

    Right wingers claiming competency for this government.

    Right wingers blaming Labour for their woes.

    Right wingers analysis of foreign conflict.

    Right wingers claiming to be intelligent.

    Right wingers.

    Baiting Right wing Trolls!


    $98/HOURLY SPECIAL REPORT!!!!……….After earning an average of 19952 Dollars monthly,I’m finally getting 98 Dollars an hour,just working 4-5 hours daily online… three to five hours of work daily… Weekly paycheck… Bonus opportunities…Payscale of $6k to $9k /a month… Just few hours of your free time, any kind of computer, elementary understanding of web and stable connection is what is required…….HERE I STARTED-TAKE A LOOK AT…….dp…….

    ➤➤➤➤ http://GoogleSpecialBucksJobsCloudOnnetCenter/$98hourlywork…. ⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛⚛

  6. Jon Jones.


  7. julietsm

    You must be retarded.

  8. stevep

    I won`t go into the political incorrectness of your comment, but if being “retarded” means I want a better, fairer, more equal, more democratic society, then I must be.
    Where does that leave you?

  9. David Davies

    Yet more ignorance of the meaning of the word `decimate’. Look it up!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.