Labour’s defence of their economic record has gone unheard, not unsaid

Balls and Miliband have repeatedly explained the crisis in terms of the global crash - but they still face accusations of evasion

 

Financial Times commentators John Hutton and Alan Milburn have hit out at Labour today for failing to defend their economic record. They write that ‘the Tory charge against the last Labour government – that the economy was wrecked because the public finances spiralled out of control – is holding sway over voters’.

Balls and Miliband, they write, have ‘foolishly’ let the Tories claim this without opposition, despite the fact that the last Labour government ‘could be considered one of the most prudent of modern times’.

The fact is though, that both the Labour leader and shadow chancellor have defended their record, uncompromisingly, on numerous occasions.

In January 2014, Ed Balls appeared on the Andrew Marr Show in defence of Labour’s pre-crash spending:

“Do I think the level of public spending going into the crisis was a problem for Britain? No, I don’t, nor our deficit, nor our national debt – what happened was a global financial crisis which pushed up the deficit.

The question then was ‘who can get the deficit down?’ – George Osborne choked off the recovery, a recovery Labour had delivered but it wasn’t caused by public spending in Britain and that’s just the truth.”

Balls also told Marr in 2011 that ‘apart from the Tories, nobody thinks that spending caused this downturn. It was a global financial crisis.’

Meanwhile, Ed Miliband told the BBC in 2011 that ”

“If you look at actually what happened, we slowed the growth of public spending in about 2005 or 2006 precisely because the tax receipts weren’t coming in sufficiently and we slowed the growth of spending in our economy.

“And, look, all round the world … President Obama is facing a large deficit. He didn’t do that because Gordon Brown was spending too much.”

He added that:

“The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats I think are pedalling a very dangerous myth because they want to tell people that it was somehow all because of a decade of overspending under Labour. It wasn’t. It was because of a financial crash – a financial crash that happened all round the world.”

Both Balls and Miliband have been clear about the fact that they believe Labour’s main mistake regarding the economy was that banks were not regulated enough. At the Labour party’s annual conference last year, the shadow chancellor said:

“While it was the banks which caused the global recession, and it was the global recession which caused deficits to rise here in Britain and around the world, the truth is we should have regulated those banks in a tougher way.”

There seems to be a prevailing impression that Labour are keeping silent on the economy because of a guilty conscience. Perhaps the reality is closer to this: the Tories, and the public, are choosing to repeatedly gloss over Labour’s defence because they provide such an easy target for blame.

Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

20 Responses to “Labour’s defence of their economic record has gone unheard, not unsaid”

  1. robertcp

    Most people are not qualified to judge the arguments about the cause of the financial crisis. They do, however, remember that Labour was in power and did not see the crash coming (the end of boom and bust etc). Labour could have been out of power for a generation if the coalition had been more intelligent and less right-wing. This is why Labour is very unlikely to get a majority this year but might lead a coalition or minority government.

  2. ForeignRedTory

    ‘the truth is we should have regulated those banks in a tougher way.”’
    And at that time, Labour was actually in power.

    ‘because they provide such an easy target for blame.’
    ’nuff said. Economy remains Labour’s weak spot.
    Labour has issued a partial Mea Culpa – which is hardly the same thing as a defence. Perhaps a defence is not really the thing to look for – if by defence you mean a fairy tale how everything was rosey.

    I think Labour should attack, rather than defend.
    The purpose is to make Milliband the PM, and the purpose is NOT to defend the former policies of Gordon Brown.

  3. Kathryn

    AND AT THAT TIME the Conservatives wanted to RELAX regulation on banks and the city.

    Gosh. Reading comprehension is not your strong point.

  4. madasafish

    Ed Miliband has criticised welfare cuts in Opposition but said he will not reverse them in Government.
    What Oppositions say is irrelevant. Governments make policy…Oppositions oppose.

    Obviously political comprehension is not your strong point 🙂

  5. sarntcrip

    yes dopey labour were in power at the time, when it was too late tory deregulation and cozying up to city
    the tories then promised to impose regulation to seperate invest,ment banking from retail banking THEY STILL HAVEN’T

Comments are closed.