Is the British government ignoring gay rights in India for trade?

It would appear that way from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office's mealy-mouthed response to the effective criminalisation of homosexuality in India.

David Cameron has in the past been accused of behaving like a travelling salesman due to his penchant for visiting countries with questionable human rights records to do arms deals.

Last year Cameron visited the Gulf with the aim of selling British-made fighter jets. At the time he was open about the government’s desire to sell weapons to the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Oman, which he said had “a right to defend themselves”.

In other words, any human rights concerns (and there are no shortage of them in terms of the aforementioned governments) would take a back seat to the business interests of the British arms industry. The government did not even try to pretend otherwise.

It isn’t only the interests of arms companies that appear to trump human rights, however. It now appears that criticism of human rights abuses must be muted if there is even the remotest prospect of awkward questions damaging ‘British interests’.

What other explanation is there for the fact that the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) cannot bring itself even to so much as condemn a Supreme Court ruling in India which has effectively criminalised homosexuality?

As reported by Pink News yesterday evening, the FCO offered a curt and unsympathetic response when asked by the website how it would be responding to the Indian Surpreme Court decision, saying only that “The actions of India’s Supreme Court are a matter for India.”

In other words, India may treat its gay citizens as abominably as it wishes.

Section 377 of India’s penal code makes ‘sex against the order of nature’ illegal, this being widely interpreted to mean gay sex. Breaking the law can result in as long as 10 years in jail. The ruling by the Supreme Court overturned a 2009 decision by the Dehli High Court which had legalised homosexual activity.

As Pink News points out, the tame response of the FCO to the Indian Supreme Court’s decision is very much at odds with previous statements about the gay rights situation in Russia, when it issued the following statement:

“It is of great concern that Russia has passed a law which imposes fines for the promotion of ‘non-traditional’ sexual relations.”

So why the double standard?

I don’t suppose it has anything to do with the fact that Vince Cable and a delegation of 25 British companies are currently in India on a four-day visit for talks with the country’s ‘captains of industry’?

It is known that David Cameron wants to significantly increase British trade with India, declaring earlier this year that Britain and India can forge one of “the great partnerships of the 21st century”.

Considering India is one of the world’s emerging economic powerhouses, the desire to build a good relationship with the country is forgivable. What isn’t is sacrificing the rights of the country’s gay population out of a misplaced desire not to rock the boat.

Statements like this from the F&C Office will do little to burnish the image of Cameron the amoral travelling salesman.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

4 Responses to “Is the British government ignoring gay rights in India for trade?”

  1. Jingoistic

    We should not only stop trading with any country that has human rights problems, India, China etc.

  2. TM

    They seem to be ignoring the rights of people in the UK too, unless nobody had noticed, unless they are rich and affluent. 31,000 pensioners died last year of hypothermia because they were too poor to heat their homes/ What about their rights??? Get our own house in order before creating another diversion.

  3. jobacon

    The truth about foreign countries’ rights abuses is that they are condemned in reverse proportion to how useful they are to the UK. Does anyone care about the suffering of people living in the Arab world because they are not considered to be citizens? The West is so desperate for Arab oil and gas that human rights abuses are totally ignored. The story of the Nepali workers worked to death in Qatar to get the football stadia ready is the tip of the iceberg. In the 1930s, the Germans got away with the worst rights abuses in human history, including starving vast swathes of Eastern Europe and Russia so as to make room for the “Master Race”; there were certainly no protests from foreign governments (including the UK). Nothing has changed.

  4. TM

    All is expediency, dear boy. When you realise and understand that, you wise up a little.

Comments are closed.