Cameron’s friends in big business hold back progress on public health

Despite public support and the medical evidence that plain packaging would save lives, David Cameron has put the interest of his chums in big business above British public health.

By shadow health minister Diane Abbott

Smoking is a killer. It is still the major preventable cause of death and disability. And it is the biggest cause of health inequality. Poor people suffer most.

We know that plain packaging is in important tool in bringing down levels of smoking. It is particularly helpful in discouraging smokers. Some thought that Cameron’s government wanted to bring in plain packaging. As late as April, the Tory Public Health minister, Anna Soubry said that she was convinced plain packaging should be introduced.

Ireland is now rightly pressing ahead with plans to force tobacco manufacturers to use standardised packaging.

Yet a few weeks ago the Sun’s well connected political editor Tom Newton Dunn reported that David Cameron had scrapped plans to force all cigarettes to be sold in plain packs:

“Mr Cameron has now ordered the proposed law to be pulled from next week’s Queen’s Speech. A Whitehall source said: ‘Plain packaging may or may not be a good idea, but it’s nothing to do with the government’s key purpose. The PM is determined to strip down everything we do so we can concentrate all our efforts on voters’ essentials. That means growth, immigration and welfare reform.'”

Yet again, this exposes real weakness from David Cameron, and it’s yet another humiliating public health car crash.

The hand of Lynton Crosby

The Sun did not identify its source, but the quote bears the hallmarks of the Conservative Party ‘strategist’ Lynton Crosby. In Australia, while Lynton Crosby was federal director of the Liberal Party, the party accepted major donations from the tobacco industry.

Between 2000 and 2010 the Party received $AUS 2.5 million from PMI and BAT. The UK Conservative Party has hired Mr Crosby through his lobbying firm Crosby Textor Fulbrook, which represents tobacco industry clients including British American Tobacco. In Australia, Mark Textor, co-founder of the company with Mr Crosby, was an adviser to the industry in its unsuccessful campaign against standardised packaging.

In the UK opposition to standardised packaging has been organised by the tobacco industry front group FOREST, through a campaign called ‘Hands Off Our Packs’. FOREST receives well over 90 per cent of its funding from the tobacco industry. The tobacco industry has also hired lobbying firms including Luther Pendragon and Goddard Global to help out.

The UK campaign against standardised packaging is just a part of a worldwide effort by the tobacco industry to defeat what it sees as a major threat to its ‘intellectual property’. In July, 2012 it was reported that the ‘tea party’ pressure group the ‘American Legislative Exchange Council’, which is backed by far right billionaires the Koch brothers, had launched a worldwide campaign against plain packaging of cigarettes.

The power of advertising

Cigarette packaging is last remaining area of tobacco advertising in the UK, following a general ban on advertising in the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act 2002, and a ban on retail displays of tobacco products under the Health Act 2009.

Tobacco manufacturers therefore design their packs very carefully, and in particular to try to appeal to new smokers. Standardised packaging would remove virtually all branding. The pack and contents would be a standard shape, size and colour, and health warnings on front and back would be increased in size.

All packs would have a quitline number and web address. All key security features on existing tobacco packaging will also be on standardised packaging, including covert anti-counterfeit marks and numerical codes, making the industry’s claim that it would increase illicit trade as mendacious as every other argument it has employed on this issue.

Lobbying information suggests that there would be a clear majority in both the Lords and the Commons for standardised packaging, in a free vote.  A free vote was used on the introduction of smokefree enclosed public places, and the measure passed in the Commons with a majority of over 200. Opinion polls also show clear public support for standardised packaging. A recent YouGov poll for ASH found that overall 64 per cent of adults in Great Britain were in favour of standard packaging.

Yet despite public support and the medical evidence that plain packaging would save lives, David Cameron has put the interest of his chums in big business above British public health.

The last Labour government showed leadership in bringing about real change on tobacco control. We introduced the smoking ban in pubs and enclosed spaces, ended sports sponsorship and billboard advertising, raised the legal age of purchasing cigarettes and put graphic warnings on cigarette packs.

It is not too late for Cameron to show similar leadership. He needs to get back on the plane from Ibiza and explain why the government is breaking yet another promise, and why doing the right thing is no longer a priority for his government.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

20 Responses to “Cameron’s friends in big business hold back progress on public health”

  1. OldLb

    At least smokers have a choice in the matter.

    However we have people being murdered in the NHS in the Liverpool care pathway.

    Not a peep. No prosecutions. Nothing.

    We have Stafford. 1,200 slaughtered. What does the NHS do about it? Well there are people connected with Stafford who don’t like the fact that people have found out so they are desecrating the grave of one of they victims and hounding her daughter out of town.

    BMJ research puts the death toll of avoidable deaths at 40,000 a year.

    Not a peep.

    Perhaps its like your approach to schooling. State sector isn’t good enough for you, so you send you kids private.

    Perhaps you do the same with your health.

    The NHS, only for the little people eh?

  2. Joshua

    ‘the medical evidence that plain packaging would save lives’ – what evidence would that be?

  3. Cole

    Still peddling that rubbish about 40,000 unnecessarily deaths a year in the NHS? You know perfectly well, the article you endlessly mention specifically says that the NHS does NOT kill 40,000, and that the likely figure is under 12,000.

  4. Tony Crotty

    If this is such a important issue why didn’t labour pass this law in the 13 years they were in government? Ms abbot neglects to mention the donation from formula one which was connected to tobacco advertising or is she being coy?

  5. LB

    That’s your figure.

    I’ve quoted and linked to the BMJ article which is not your article.

    So even today, we have the news that in behaviour reminicent of a car built by British Leyland on Friday afternoon, the NHS is bumping people off over the weekend.

    How many have been killed by that avoidable death?

Comments are closed.