The Financial Times reports today that home secretary Teresa May was forced to "water down" her first major speech on immigration last week, after an intervention from Downing Street and business secretary Vince Cable. Unnamed sources within the government told the FT that May's original speech was "over the top" - with particular objections to passages which attacked the level of Tier 1 visas.
The Financial Times reports today that home secretary Theresa May was forced to “water down” her first major speech on immigration last week, after an intervention from Downing Street and business secretary Vince Cable. Unnamed sources within the government told the FT that May’s original speech was “over the top” – with particular objections to passages which attacked the level of Tier 1 visas.
The paper claims that Number 10 and Vince Cable had exerted pressure to soften the tone of the speech, and have a more liberal approach to Tier 1 immigrants.
These tensions at the heart of the coalition over one the government’s flagship policies are revealing, and follow a week of criticism over the damaging economic effects of increasingly strict immigration caps – particularly towards skilled tier 1 workers.
As Left Foot Forward reported last week, criticism of the immigration cap has come from a wide variety of sources, including David Cameron’s former speech writer Ian Birrell, who accused his former employer of imposing an arbitrary cap because the prime minister was “spooked by voices in the media”.
Additionally, the ippr wrote on Left Foot Forward that the government was torn between an ineffective policy that “it knows is damaging to the economy and public services” or finding a way to abandon or redefine the target. This was followed by criticism from small businesses, who argue the tier 1 cap will be “damaging to business”.
Next week the Migration Advisory Committee, will report back with its recommended cap for next year’s immigration, believed to be lower than this year. It will be interesting to see whether May’s flagship policy is further watered down by her coalition partners, such as Vince Cable, who believe it to be a significant threat to the recovery.
In September, Cable told Left Foot Forward the immigration cap was “doing great damage” and had left him “at the limit of collective responsibility”, adding he was “not willing” to defend the system at present.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
7 Responses to “Home secretary forced to “water down” immigration speech”
Sarah Duff
RT @leftfootfwd Home secretary forced to "water down" immigration speech: http://bit.ly/bwpXj3
Didi Vonmonied
What was that about the Nasty Party, Theresa? Convenient amnesia. https://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/11/theresa-may-immigration-speech/
Jonathan McClory
RT @leftfootfwd: Home secretary forced to "water down" immigration speech: http://bit.ly/bwpXj3
L DTUC
RT @leftfootfwd: Home secretary forced to "water down" immigration speech: http://bit.ly/bwpXj3
mike
Did she say anything about Camerons new Wave of Chinese students ???????? all on reduced tution fees (paying less than UK students)
TORY AND DAILY MAIL LIES LIES ON IMMIGRATION – YET AGAIN