Cutting red tape? More like axing the green economy

The Government is abolishing15 environmental bodies, blowing another hole in its claim to be ‘the greenest government ever’, reports Guy Shrubsole.

Green wood is not meant to burn well. But it appears that the Government is stoking its ‘bonfire of the quangos’ with the abolition of 15 environmental bodies, and considering the abolition of many more, blowing another hole in its claim to be ‘the greenest government ever’.

At the same time, the confirmed abolition of the Regional Development Agencies will lead to £40 million being cut from low-carbon investment programmes.

In Cabinet Office papers leaked to the Telegraph yesterday, it was revealed that 177 non-departmental public bodies (‘quangos’) are set to be abolished, with a further 94 currently under review.

Examination of the list reveals that environmental regulatory and advisory bodies constitute a significant proportion of those being culled – despite only saving an estimated £6.75m in public spending, and with many of the bodies operating at no cost to the public purse.

Amongst the bodies for the chop include the Renewables Advisory Board – an expert panel drawn from industry that advises on renewable energy policy; the Commission for Integrated Transport, which researches how to reduce transport emissions and congestion; and the Regional Development Agencies, responsible for £40m of low-carbon research and development over the past financial year, according to recent analysis by the committee on climate change.

Incredibly, bodies as central to the Government climate programme as the Carbon Trust and the Forestry Commission are not yet off the ‘endangered list’ of “Bodies still under review”.

The privatisation of the Forestry Commission has been mooted before, but what this would mean in terms of retaining a national forest stock is unknown. It is possible that the Carbon Trust is being eyed up for assimilation into the proposed Green Investment Bank – as suggested by the Green Investment Bank Commission earlier this year – but simply moving funds around, rather than earmarking new money, will be insufficient to stimulate private sector green investment.

Nor is this the last of it.

As the Telegraph reports:

“Other bodies that are likely to survive but face significant budget cuts are the Environment Agency, the Energy Savings Trust and the Fuel Poverty Advisory Group.”

The revelations follow hot on the heels of the announced abolition of the Sustainable Development Commission, and recent concerns that the promised £60m Ports Fund – for developing ports into manufacturing hubs for wind turbines – is under threat.

The cull of public bodies follows a worryingly ideological pattern. It is no secret that the right wing Taxpayers’ Alliance has been lobbying for years to squash environmental regulation and spending. As Left Foot Forward highlighted in July, Caroline Spelman’s decision to abolish the Sustainable Development Commission had been presaged with repeated lobbying by the Taxpayers’ Alliance, who called it “…a Government-sponsored campaign for an increase in green and environmentally aware policy.”

The TPA’s policy director Matthew Sinclair boasted on Twitter that it was a ‘#tpapolicywin’, while in a blog piece posted yesterday, the TPA revealed its desire to see even more green government bodies swept away, stating:

“Whilst the news is initially encouraging… the Telegraph also lists a number of bodies still under review. It names the Carbon Trust, The Advisory Council on Public Records and the Energy Savings Trust among others whose future is yet undecided

“This shows that there are still lots more quangos that can be added to this growing bonfire.”

Others on the right are clearly rubbing their hands with glee at the thought of rolling back bodies that attempt – heaven forbid – to tackle global warming. Andrew Porter, the Telegraph’s political editor, wrote yesterday:

“The abolition of the British Council would be welcomed by many… Critics have accused it of being hijacked and used to promote such causes as climate change.”

The irony of such small-statist antagonism towards green quangos is how little they cost the taxpayer, despite their value in providing expert advice to government. By the admission of the Taxpayers’ Alliance themselves, the Renewables Advisory Board cost precisely £0 in 2008-9. The same was true of the Advisory Committee on Carbon Abatement Technologies, and many other similar bodies earmarked for abolition.

Interestingly, six quangos that deal with nuclear liabilities appear to have escaped the guillotine, despite eating up more than £800m of public funds – and despite the Coalition pledge to remove public subsidy for nuclear.

Nick Clegg claims he did not enter politics to cut public spending, and I am not interested in politics because of some bizarre wish to defend unelected civil servants. But taking an axe to dozens of environmental regulators and funds threatens to choke off the green economy just as it is coming to life.

It is quite some irony that, on the same day as the energy secretary sings the praises of the nascent British offshore wind industry, the Renewables Advisory Board is abolished and £40m cut from low-carbon funding. If only it were a laughing matter.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

8 Responses to “Cutting red tape? More like axing the green economy”

  1. AdamRamsay

    RT @leftfootfwd: Cutting red tape? More like axing the green economy: – @guyshrubsole on the axing of green bodies

  2. jim carroll

    RT @leftfootfwd: Cutting red tape? More like axing the green economy: – @guyshrubsole on the axing of green bodies

  3. Chattertrap Climate

    Cutting red tape? More like axing the green economy #climate

  4. OBU Sustainability

    RT @leftfootfwd: Cutting red tape? More like axing the green economy: – @guyshrubsole on the axing of green bodies

Comments are closed.