Politics Summary: Thursday, December 10th

The papers are fairly damning of Alistair Darling’s pre-Budget report, which Left Foot Forward gave a 6.6/10 rating against our five red lines. The FT claims the “route to austerity still shrouded in fog” and says the theme was “dissatisfaction delayed” while for the Independent there is a “glaring hole in this pre-Budget report” which “promised so much and delivered so little.” The Guardian says “Darling soaks the rich and the rest of us too” but Larry Elliot is kinder: “he did as well as could be expected in lousy circumstances.” The Times leader mocks Darling for saying “we start from a position of strength”. Unsurprisingly, the right wing press are most critical. For the Telegraph, “Darling accused of ‘pre-election con’ over benefits”. The Mail calls it a “buckpasser’s Budget” while the Express call it “Labour’s war on workers.” The Mirror focus on the positive: “Alistair Darling bashes the bankers with fatcat tax”. The Guardian has a useful summary of the main points for those who missed them.

Reaction has also been mixed. In Parliament, Shadow Chancellor George Osborne said, “At the end of their period in office they have indeed adhered to the greatest of golden rules: never trust a Labour government with your money again.” While Lib Dem treasury spokesman Vince Cable criticised the rise in NICs: “None of this increase in taxation is going to be used to pay down the borrowing requirement or the deficit, it is complete distortion of the priorities the government should have.” The 1 per cent public sector pay restraint is unpopular with the unions. Dave Prentis, general secretary of Unison, said “Our members feel angry and betrayed.” But there was praise for the tax on bankers’ bonuses, which was welcomed by campaigners from the Compass pressure group while former analyst and Cityboy author Geraint Anderson said “Brown and Darling have done the right thing.” According to the FT, the move has split the Tories: Boris Johnson said it was “regrettable”; Michael Fallon who sits on Treasury select committee called it a “diversion” while Ken Clarke dismissed it as “political candy floss” and “tinsel”. George Osborne will not oppose the tax. But John Varley, chief executive of Barclays, has warned of an exodus of talent.

Breaking news from the Guardian outlines that more than 50 MPs “flipped” their second home allowance last year from one property to another. New figures were released this morning after Commons Speaker John Bercow performed a U-turn after being criticised for initially allowing information to be withheld. The Independent says that the documents were edited to cover up sensitive information like account numbers, addresses and signatures, but were not as heavily “redacted” as those released earlier this year in swathes of black ink. They show that Mr Bercow himself claimed a total of £22,465.49 in ACA in 2008/09, for mortgage interest, council tax, gas, electricity and cleaning on his second home.

Negotiations at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen dramatically broke down yesterday after developing countries were split between those who favour a new protocol and others who want to continue with the legally binding Kyoto agreement. Meanwhile in a syndicated article in the Guardian, former US Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin calls on Obama to boycott the summit. The Times outlines how the Met Office has asked more than 1,700 scientists to sign a statement defending the “professional integrity” of global warming research. The Independent reports new research by British scientists showing that there is “only 50/50” chance of keeping the global temperature rise to 2C – widely regarded as the limit of what the Earth can safely stand.

The Guardian reports that Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy are to meet in Brussels tomorrow after “weeks of friction over Europe’s top jobs and British angst over alleged French plotting to tame the City of London.” Sarkozy had called off a visit to London last week. The pair have written an article for the Wall Street Journal calling for a financial transaction “Tobin” tax and a worldwide tax on bank bonuses similar to that levied yesterday by Alistair Darling.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

5 Responses to “Politics Summary: Thursday, December 10th”

  1. Anon E Mouse

    Will – You report: “The Times outlines how the Met Office has asked more than 1,700 scientists to sign a statement defending the “professional integrity” of global warming research.”.

    Says everything about the trustworthiness of this lot.

    I notice: “One scientist told The Times he felt under pressure to sign. “The Met Office is a major employer of scientists and has long had a policy of only appointing and working with those who subscribe to their views on man-made global warming,” he said.”

    Which fully illustrates my point about not trusting any of the scientists on the payroll. The old adage, “well they would say that, wouldn’t they” springs to mind.

    The disgraceful wording of the “Norwegian Text” to cripple the poor by richer nations (again) and the “Climategate” dishonesty from these heretics means the sooner this whole waste of time and taxes is over the better.

    Perhaps one of LFF’s regular contributors to the blog, Rupert Read for example, would care to answer the charge that it is OK for richer nations to punish the poor of the world and treat them in an inequitable manner.

    Personally I do not believe the end justifies the means and wish the richer nations would work together to help the poor of the world instead of penalising them so openly. This whole thing stinks. Shame on those ‘delegates’.

  2. Billy Blofeld


    You give the PBR an “average” score against your red lines, but do you and others in the Labour Party really want 5 more years of Brown?

    Do you really think Gordon Brown is the right person to fix the British economy?

  3. Anon E Mouse

    Billy – I cannot understand why the Labour activists want Brown in office because if he’s in they’re out. He’s hopeless.

    I have never known a time when a government is so out of touch with the electorate – how thick are the walls on Browns bunker?

    The Labour Party are sleepwalking into opposition and no one seems able to see it. Perhaps it’s because they’re frightened of being on the receiving end of a flying Nokia cell phone from Brown or that bully Liam Byrne.

    Instead of this site spending it’s time spouting drivel about whether or not Spain is in the G20, it should start acting for the benefit of the Labour Party and listen to critics like me.

    Can you imagine an activist knocking on the door of a voter to try to persuade them to vote Labour at the election? Good luck….

  4. Kurt

    Politics Summary: Thursday, December 10th | Left Foot Forward http://bit.ly/5WLh13

  5. Niki

    Politics Summary: Thursday, December 10th | Left Foot Forward: The Times outlines how the Met Office has asked .. http://bit.ly/4NJC7Z

Comments are closed.