What does Nigel Farage actually think about gay marriage, kosher meat and the NHS? His words and policies contradict each other so much it's impossible to know
Nigel Farage appeared on the Today show this morning to discuss UKIP’s immigration policy. The UKIP leader seemed to contradict himself and his party several times, telling the programme that he would not introduce ‘arbitrary’ immigration targets, and then that he wanted to get net immigration down to a ‘normal’ level of between 20,000 and 50,000.
Farage was also played a clip from last week in which his part’s migration spokesman Steven Woolfe said UKIP would introduce a cap of 50,000 and reduce net migration by 167,000 per year. He was unable to provide a clear answer on whether UKIP’s immigration policy was numerically focused, but it seems likely that the Conservatives’ failure to meet their own targets have made Farage wary of setting himself up for a fall.
We might expect immigration to be the one policy that UKIP are clear on, but this is not their first major U-turn that has left voters confused:
1. Privatising the NHS
Over the past few months Farage has repeatedly flip-flopped on his plans for the NHS. In November 2014 a 2012 video was leaked in which he said that he believes Britain should move to an insurance-based health system, prompting UKIP to state that their policies had changed since then.
However in January, Farage told the BBC’s Nick Robinson that he believed privatising the health service was ‘a debate that we’re all going to have to return to’, and that opposition from his party members had forced him to temporarily drop a policy that he believed in. He then said in February that ‘UKIP is committed to a national health service that is free at the point of access and paid for out of taxation full-stock’.
2. Hedge fund support
In a leaked document from 2012, several hedge fund managers were named as UKIP supporters, including Rupert Murdoch’s son-in-law Crispin Odey. Minutes for a speech by Farage record him saying:
“People who would have slammed the door in our face 3 years ago are inviting us. The key to money for us will be the hedge fund industry.”
This is despite Farage’s long-standing criticism that the Conservatives are too reliant on support from city investors, and his presenting UKIP as an everyman’s alternative to the bankrolled mainstream parties.
3. Luxury goods tax
In September UKIP’s economy spokesman Patrick O’Flynn floated the idea of a luxury goods tax at party conference.The 25 per cent VAT would have hit items like designer handbags, shoes and sports cars, and it quickly garnered attention as a possible way to recruit disillusioned working-class Labour voters. But just days later Farage told Andrew Marr ‘I’m pretty certain that while I am leader that will not be in our manifesto.’
4. Gay marriage
The blatant homophobia of some of its members is one of the most concerning aspects of UKIP’s record. Nigel Farage himself has been lukewarm on the subject of same-sex marriage, claiming somewhat illogically last March that he would not support it whilst the UK was still signed up to the European Court of Human Rights. He told LBC Radio that new legislation could force churches to conduct ceremonies that they and their members were ideologically opposed to.
However, prior to this there had been confusion when an apparently unapproved Q&A session with the leader by Pink News was sent to press, in which Farage said that his party were reviewing their policies on the issues, and they would not be campaigning to abolish same-sex marriage. Having denied this, Farage now looks set to U-turn again, with the Mirror revealing last week that UKIP are likely to change their stance on gay marriage (they oppose it but support civil partnerships) in an attempt to drum up public support.
5. Halal and Kosher abbattoirs
Last month UKIP became the first political party to support animal rights groups in a ban on non-stun slaughter of animals. A statement on their website said:
“Animal and veterinary science has long concluded that cutting the throats of animals whilst they are fully conscious can cause significant distress and pain.
“We see no reason why religious groups should not take into account the concerns of animal welfare when carrying out slaughter.”
This is after Farage addressed a meeting organised by the Jewish Chronicle in 2013, saying he passionately defended the right of the Jewish community to carry out shechita. UKIP’s Jewish candidates reacted angrily to the policy change, with Jeremy Zeid, candidate for Hendon, describing it as a ‘monumental mistake’.
The shechita debacle is one of the most obvious examples of UKIP trying to widen their appeal by telling different groups different things – and hoping noone’s switched on enough to notice.
Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
11 Responses to “Five UKIP u-turns which show Farage still hasn’t got his policies sorted”
littleoddsandpieces
Five policy u turns that would bring me back to voting Labour, as I did for most of my near two thirds of a century of life, as did the generations before me.
1. Revoke the Coalition’s Pension Bills 2010-2014 (flat rate pension that is more the gone pension and never will be a single tier from all the different amounts for each individual for decades to coming, according to the DSWP themselves)
2. Pay the full state pension equally, irregardless of National Insurance history,
to each citizen aged 60-64 in 2015 of the current £113.10
instead of leaving huge numbers of men and women with nil state pension for life from 2016.
Was a Greens policy that they chickened out of.
3. Not reduce basic state pension because of the mis-selling of opt out from the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme that began on 6 April 1978, that was a top up to the state pension,
not instead of the basic pension
as now coming on and from 6 April 2016 with the flat rate, that is nothing of the sort.
Being as people retiring next year are already getting forecasts as low as £55 per week even after paying 35 years NI.
4. Pay the tiny (but something) Category D state pension top up to the small pro rata pension to people turning 80 in 2016, as now.
5. Raise the state pension to an equal £278.10 per week for all citizen pensioners in next tax year to make up for the mostly public sector workers who were opted out without understanding what was being done.
Who later then signed up for Voluntary Extra Contributions to such as a council works pension scheme, that was nothing of the sort but was, in fact, a private pension.
Then that private pension provider firm went bust, taking all the pension savings with them.
And add one thing for the rest of the population that The Greens had but also chickened out of:
– CITIZEN INCOME, universal and automatic
meaning end of all benefit regime (Housing benefit work in progress) and the hundreds of billions wasted on state and private contract welfare admin.
But Class War offer double dole and pension, so The Greens were only offering the same as Jobseekers, as is UKIP, for the basic income. So the Citizen Income will have to be more than £114 per week before offered by Class War.
Then watch as the national debt is paid off, welfare bill ends, fewer elderly end up freezing and going to NHS hospitals, as well as the starving of all ages with the massive rise in malnutrition hospital admissions and Rickets in kids, and businesses thrives and youth jobs created on the high street.
Oh, and Labour get a majority government, instead of being merely neck and neck with the Tories, and risking ending up like an old Daily Mirror headline that said
Labour Surge but Tories Still In Command.
http://www.anastasia-england.me.uk
damon
”The blatant homophobia of some of its members is one of the most concerning aspects of UKIP’s record.”
These are the views of everyday people who live where you live. Are you that frightened by the old fashioned views of your neighbours?
UKIP are just the ordinary people given a voice outside of the online comments section of the Daily Mail.
They aren’t going to become the government, so don’t worry.
Leon Wolfeson
No, most everyday people don’t hate others for their sexuality. It’s increasingly rare.
You keep making out that a minority – one which skews very old – is the “normal person”, the majority as you’re trying to make out.
And both major parties are trying to apease UKIP, which is stupid – it’s worrying for this country’s position as a civilised one which enjoys normal treaties and trade with other countries.
Newsbot09
Ah yes, no surprise that you whine and demand that dissenting opinions be silenced as you spew hate against the Christian and the elderly and anyone else who opposes your monoculture vision of society. Keep trying to control the peons. Unlike you I believe in democracy.
JoeDM
Yep. That’s pretty much it. Ordinary people saying ordinary everyday things.
The political establishment are shocked to hear it !!!!