Gypsy MPs and condom harmonisation: the 10 best right-wing EU scare stories

A compendium of right-wing scare stories about the EU.

In light of Ed Miliband’s announcement yesterday that Labour would not hold a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU unless there was a significant transfer of powers to Brussels, the right-wing press has erupted in fury.

“Ed Miliband has been on the receiving end of an “onslaught” from both Tory and Labour Eurosceptics after effectively ruling out an EU referendum,” thundered the Mail.

Indeed, the right are not happy.

As a consequence, expect a resurgence in EU scare stories as we approach the 2015 General Election – the purpose being to demonstrate just how tyrannical the European Union behaves towards ‘the little guy’.

After all, the right-wing press have history in this respect don’t they? Remember these?

1) The headline: Now EU ‘crackpots’ demand gypsy MPs

Last year the Daily Express reported that, if a resolution from the European Parliament were to become law, “all the political parties in the UK will have to impose female gypsy candidates on the electorate and get them into Parliament”.

The truth: The story was described by an MEP in a letter sent to the Express as “fabricated from beginning to end”. And it was. The powers the EU has are given to it by member states through unanimously agreed treaties. These treaties include nothing about intervention in how candidates are selected for national elections.

2) The headline: the EU…has decreed that condom dimensions should be harmonised across the seamless Continent – (The Independent on Sunday, page 25, 12 March 2000)

The truth: Again this was false. The European Standardisation Committee (CEN) referred to in the article is a voluntary body which has nothing to do with the EU.

3) The headline: EU’s latest bloomer! Brussels bid to ban gardeners from buying favourite iris, lavender and clematis plants

Last year the Daily Mail reported that a number of British garden favourites were to be banned from garden centres because of plans to improve EU rules and cut red tape.

The truth: In reality the EU commission was proposing to remove regulations from garden plants rather than impose new ones. The EC proposal states that ornamental plants will no longer be covered by most of the rules on “plant reproductive material”. This would mean that in future Garden plants would only need to comply with a few general rules. The Mail has got things completely the wrong way round, probably intentionally.

4) The headline: EU serves up gadus ‘n’ chips (Daily Mail, 5 September 2001, page 7)

“Fancy a nice plate of gadus morhua and chips? You may be tucking into them under proposed regulations from Brussels bureaucrats. They want fish to be called by their Latin names so the terms can be understood throughout the European Union.”

The truth: The European Commission had proposed clearer labelling on food products so that consumers were fully aware of what it was they were buying. If it is cod then it can be labelled as cod; if it isn’t, then it can’t be. In all honesty it’s hard to see what the problem is.

5) The headline: New map of Britain that makes Kent part of France (Daily Mail, 4 September 2006, p.10)

“For centuries the people of Kent have called their county the Garden of England. So they might find it quite a surprise that – according to the European Union at least – they are actually part of France. Along with next-door Sussex, Kent has been rolled in with the Calais areas on a map drawn up for Brussels.”

The truth: The planned database was created to help support environmental protection in the EU rather than redraw the map of Europe. The idea was to improve Europe’s ability to protect biodiversity and fight pollution. It had nothing to do with wiping Britain off the map.

6) The headline: Energy-guzzling plasma TVs will be banned in Brussels eco blitz (Daily Mail, 12th January 2009)

“Giant energy-guzzling flatscreens are expected to be banned under legislation due to be agreed by the EU this spring. Plasma screens have been nicknamed the ’4x4s’ of the living room because they use up to four times as much electricity and are responsible for up to four times as much carbon dioxide as traditional cathode ray tube sets…”

Again, this is completely untrue. The two measures which were introduced relate to minimum standards for the energy efficiency of televisions and a TV energy-labeling scheme which already exist for washing machines and fridges. There was no plan to ban plasma televisions, and the purpose of the labelling scheme was to ensure that consumers knew how much their new television would cost them in terms of energy.

7) The headline: Traditional pizzas are to be outlawed by the EU under new laws regulating their diameter and depth (Daily Mail, p.23, 17 November 1994)

The truth: I’m not entirely sure where this idea came from, but  it is completely without foundation.

8) The headline: Off their rockers – EU wants to ban rocking horses (The Sun, 28 November 2003, page 35)

Barmy EU bosses are threatening to BAN rocking horses. A new ‘safety’ law insists that toys for kids to ride indoors must be no more than 2ft high. That would nobble rocking horses – and mini carousels.”

The truth: The European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) standards are decided on by individual member states; the European Commission’s services are not involved.

9) The headline: Hands off our barmaids’ boobs (The Sun 4 August 2005)

“The EU has declared a crackpot war on busty barmaids – by trying to ban them from wearing low-cut tops. Po-faced penpushers have deemed it a HEALTH HAZARD for bar girls to show too much cleavage. And in a daft directive that will have drinkers choking on their pints, Brussels bureaucrats have ordered a cover-up. They say barmaids run a skin cancer risk if they expose themselves to the sun when they go outside to collect glasses. Last night the move was blasted as an affront. Annie Powell, of real ale group Camra, raged: “It’s just another blatant example of Europe gone mad.”

The truth: The EU rules, voted on in 2005, said nothing about barmaids wearing low-cut tops, but rather required employers to assess the risk of skin and retina damage for workers who spent a lot of time working in the sun.

10) The headline: Kilts are for girls – They’re branded womenswear (Daily Record, 10 November 2003, page 1)

“Eurocrats have ruled that the kilt is ‘womenswear’. Spaniard Pedro Solbes, an EU commissioner, insists our national dress should be listed as a skirt on official forms. And kiltmakers could be fined up to £1000 if they don’t comply….”

The truth: A questionnaire was sent to manufacturers which requested that kilts be listed as ‘women’s apparel’. However the questionnaire was sent by the UK Office of National Statistics rather than the EU’s statistical branch.

HT: Euromyths Index

14 Responses to “Gypsy MPs and condom harmonisation: the 10 best right-wing EU scare stories”

  1. Cole

    It’s interesting that a recent poll showed only 2% of Brits thought the EU was the most important political issue and only 6% put it in their top 3. So much for the crazy fulminating by the right wing press and Ukip types.

  2. Kryten2k35

    Miliband is right about the EU, and no, we the people shouldn’t get a say on it, just because of a few fuckwit UKIP dickwads spreading rubbish.

  3. longlostpoet

    can anyone tell me, when we voted to allow the EU to govern us ?
    i only ever voted for a free transition of people and goods (plus fast payment for those goods), across the EU internal borders.

  4. Primly Stable

    Don’t forget the Express front page screaming “EU MEDDLERS RULE WE CAN’T HAVE MILK JUGS”. The actual story was simply that a Spanish university study had found that the dairy products in cafes often breached EU health guidelines. The apology and correction didn’t make the front page.

  5. Primly Stable

    In fact there’s a whole selection of Express euro-myths here: http://tabloid-watch.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/express-every-criticism-we-levelled.html

  6. JC

    Please will you follow this up with 10 examples where they have been correct? I think we all know that both sides distort the debate, so it would be good if you could accept that there are some times when the EU is not best for us.

    I have seen all sorts of stupid claims for the benefits of being in the EU made by the pro-EU groups, even suggesting that our own government (of any hue) is always too stupid to bring in legislation that benefits the people, so the EU has to do it for them. Examples are such as H&S regulation, food safety etc. Maybe you could add some examples of your own as well?

  7. Lee Hyde

    Perhaps you could; feel free to write a blog and share the link here. My prediction? You may find examples of debatable claims made by pro-EU voices, but nothing quite as frivolous and barking mad as the above wilful misrepresentations and fabrications (the tip of the iceberg). Frankly, if the anti-EU crowd has to stoop so low, it doesn’t bode well, does it.

  8. Selohesra

    If its only a few fuckwit UKIP dickwads what have you got to lose from a referendum you should get a stonking majority to stay in EU

  9. Kryten2k35

    Face? I’m sure the rest of the EU would think we’re a set of pricks. Fact is, we’re all better off as part of the EU.

  10. JC

    You obviously don’t remember a previous minister for Europe who would list all sorts of fatuous claims.Stopping the third world war was one.

  11. Cole

    Why should there be a referendum on the EU just because a few right wingers want one? We’re not allowed them on anything else.

  12. Cole

    They don’t rule us. And we didn’t vote for all sorts of policies that are being imposed on us, like flogging off the NHS – which most people are more concerned about than conspiracy theories about the EU.

  13. benyoudel

    When are we going to have a referendum on the NHS, a fair democratic vote, instead of a few Etonians having their way?

  14. Kryten2k35

    We didn’t vote for that, but just as well we didn’t, since with the Tory spin on things, we’d never get anything done. The EU forces this government to do what it should, but doesn’t want to, do.

Leave a Reply