“We’re clearly not there yet”: Mixed reaction to Keir Starmer’s conference speech

Interrupted by chants of “Oh, Jeremy Corbyn”, Starmer attempted to present Labour as a serious alternative to the Tory government.


After a week of ups and downs, the Labour leader delivered a 90-minute speech on the last day of conference, which covered a broad range of topics.

Doreen Lawrence, the mother of murdered Stephen Lawrence, introduced Starmer, who walked onto the stage to Fat Boy Slim’s “Right Here, Right Now” soundtrack.

Interrupted by chants of “Oh, Jeremy Corbyn”, Starmer attempted to present Labour as a serious alternative to the Tory government, making a series of promises and policies.

Shifting NHS priority

One such pledge is to shift NHS priority “from emergency care, towards prevention.” Describing mental health as one of the “urgent needs of our time”, the party leader said Labour would guarantee support will be available in “less than a month” and would recruit more professionals in mental health to ensure schools have specialist support and communities have open access to mental health hubs.

“Under Labour, spending on mental health will never be allowed to fall”, he said.

‘Most ambitious school improvement plan in a generation’

Starmer said that under a Labour government “education will recover”, as the party will launch the “most ambitious school improvement plan in a generation.” Two weeks of compulsory work experience would be reinstated, and Labour would guarantee that every young person will get to see a careers advisor. The school improvement plan would provide every child with the opportunity to play competitive sport and play an instrument, Starmer announced.

In relation to crime, Starmer said Labour would strengthen legal protections for the victims of crime.

On climate, the Labour leader spoke of the party’s Green New Deal and how it will include a climate investment pledge to fund the likes of making upgrades to making new homes zero carbon. He pledged to insulate every home in the next decade and to introduce a Clean Air Act and a “net zero” test for “everything we do in government.”

On the economy, Starmer said Labour would support small businesses and invest a minimum of 3% of GDP in science and research and development.

Reaction is mixed

Reaction to the speech has been mixed. Some saw it has progress, a positive end to a week beset with unsavoury infighting and the shock resignation of shadow employment secretary, Andy McDonald.

Ben McGowan, a politics student, told the BBC the speech was “good” and saw it as progress on Starmer’s predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn.

“It was the first time we were able to see him and get a clear vision of what he was about,” he said.

“He was confident, and he just came up with things that sounded like we could win. It may not have been policy heavy, but it was a vision that I think will get through to the public.”

“We will have to wait and see about that at the ballot box…”

Christina McAnea, general secretary of Unison, said Starmer’s leadership was “offering just what the country needs after 11 years of Tory mismanagement.”

“Keir’s speech shows that Labour in power could bring hope to the many families forgotten by this government,” said McAnea.

“We’re clearly not there yet

Not everyone was convinced by Starmer’s speech, which has come under fire for showing focus on winning rather than unity.

Unite’s national political lead Rob MacGregor didn’t delay in sharing his reservations about the speech’s lack of substance.

“If you’re a Unite member worried about the cost of living crisis, empty petrol pumps, abhorrent fire and rehire in our workplaces and the end of furlough just hours away, there wasn’t much in this speech.

“We needed to hear a Labour leader who is as angry as we are about the harm being done to our workers, and as determined as Unite to stand up against abusive employers.

“We’re clearly not there yet,” said MacGregor.  

‘Very few solutions’

Andrew Scattergood, co-chair of Momentum said Starmer “identified a lot of problems but offered very few solutions” in his speech, adding: “We all know that the NHS crisis is bad – but what will our party do about it?”

Author and political correspondent Paul Walker said that for a very long speech it had little in terms of new announcement, and none which will make a headline.

“News reports will have to digest the main message: I’m serious, PM is not; we’re very different from Corbyn era; we’re serious about winning,” said Walker.

Guardian columnist Owen Jones cited similar grievances about Starmer’s quest to dissociate the party from the Corbyn era, tweeting:

“The problem with Keir Starmer’s speech is a very simple one.

“The only thing his team passionately believe in is defining themselves against the left. They just don’t have positive alternative to the Tories or compelling vision for the country. This is a problem.”

Contrasting reaction to the leader’s speech affirms what has been felt during the last five days in Brighton – that the conference – much like the party itself – felt distinctively split into two very different tribes.

Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead is a freelance journalist and contributing editor to Left Foot Forward.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

Comments are closed.