Comments on: Why we must put the new Public Procurement Regulations on hold https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/ Left Foot Forward is the home for UK progressives. We provide evidence-based analysis on British politics, news and policy. Tue, 03 Mar 2015 23:33:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.5 By: Kevin Stall https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-704628 Tue, 03 Mar 2015 23:33:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-704628 In reply to Guest.

Have you been a moron long? Did you think there are no agencies in the government? There are several. I’m beginning to see why you have your closely held political views.

]]>
By: Guest https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-704284 Sun, 01 Mar 2015 16:31:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-704284 In reply to Kevin Stall.

One moment you’re a government employee.
Next you’re an agency worker.

And you can’t do the job you were contracted to do, and are trying to basically expense giving it to someone who can! What utter cheek – they should can your contract instead, but you want a blank cheque by removing “complexity”. (That’s “accountability”)

]]>
By: Guest https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-704283 Sun, 01 Mar 2015 16:29:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-704283 In reply to Kevin Stall.

“Some privatization is needed”

You want it. Not the same thing.

Keep looking to cut wages and “costs” by slashing basic spending to the bone, so you can make a higher profit this quarter and smash the economy in the longer term, as we’re seeing now.

]]>
By: Kevin Stall https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-704223 Sun, 01 Mar 2015 09:16:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-704223 In reply to reddead.

Some privatization is needed. You can’t employ someone full-time or have the necessary equipment for something you only need occasionally. Do you keep a department of programmers on the payroll so they can write software you might need in the future? Only a third of companies have in-house training teams. Do you stop contracting that out. The civil service has a commitment to provide 5 days of training a year. Should the government maintain a cleaning crew for every building used by the government and maintain a maintenance staff to keep it in repair or contract it out? It saves on managerial cost for one thing.

]]>
By: Kevin Stall https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-704221 Sun, 01 Mar 2015 09:06:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-704221 The worst part of this is the increase cost. I work for an agency and we out source to some professionals that are not available within our agency. We put in the purchase request a month ago and it is still being worked on by a EO making sat 30,000 a year. We have used this supplier for 10 years and gives us the best price and fastest service. But yet the procurement regulations are so complex that they have to do the same process for a purchase of £300.00 as it does for a million pound contract.

]]>
By: Peter Smith https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-703753 Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:35:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-703753 Do you understand what you are suggesting? The “best price/ quality” ratio is a meaningless expression unless you define the evaluation methodology. And – just an example – if we did have a stab at doing that, then the “best price quality ratio” in wine at the moment is probably fine Sherry. But that’s not what you would buy for any conceivable purpose. (BMW may well win all the Car tenders on that basis too). I sympathize with some of your ideas but if you want to make serious suggestions, you really need to understand the topic better.

]]>
By: Leon Wolfeson https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-703743 Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:50:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-703743 As I understand it, they can be changed before the deadline anyway.

]]>
By: blarg1987 https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-703728 Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:41:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-703728 In reply to reddead.

It might have the opposite effect as if the public alternative is cheaper, it will show up the fallacy of private is cheaper and be even harder for a government to claim otherwise.

]]>
By: reddead https://leftfootforward.org/2015/02/why-we-must-put-the-new-public-procurement-regulations-on-hold/#comment-703702 Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:42:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=99273#comment-703702 Yes BUT,even if rules change it will still result in more privatisation.if the ‘socially responsible’ rule gets approved then even if private profit based providers complain surely the gov will financially sweeten the deals.to oil the sell offs.we will still witness the ongoing threats to the WelfareState ?

]]>