Comments on: Labour demand big improvements to Work Capability Assessments https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/ Left Foot Forward is the home for UK progressives. We provide evidence-based analysis on British politics, news and policy. Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.5 By: Debbie St Jacques https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-6/#comment-710002 Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:56:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-710002 In reply to Leon Wolfeson.

Here here

]]>
By: Debbie St Jacques https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-5/#comment-710001 Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:48:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-710001 I was hoping Labour we’re going to scrap the whole thing and let our qualified doctors who know us and our medical histories do the assessments. I am very disappointed to read that Labour are basically doing the same as the diabolical Atos. Who to vote for now??

]]>
By: Alan Foulds https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-5/#comment-706755 Wed, 25 Mar 2015 23:20:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-706755 Abolish it altogether Kate any process like this causes too much stress on vulnerable adults who suffer from any kind of disability and if a gp keeps signing a patient sick nnote

]]>
By: john mcgeown https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-5/#comment-706734 Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:56:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-706734 If a person is diagnosed as incapable of work through disability and/or chronic illness by the relevant qualified medical practitioner then why do politicians think they then need to go through the humiliation of the WCA at all !! It is a disgrace that people in this position are made to feel like skivers and scroungers by the very people they look on as skivers and scroungers i.e. The house of lords, expenses scandals, 2nd homes etc. Abolish this utterly degrading façade and help these people to cope in life rather than hounding them to suicide or early death through starvation, losing their homes or not being able to heat or clothe themselves. Go and chase the bankers, corporate tax evaders, the profiteering landlords, the paedophiles at the BBC, the slave traders using workfare as an excuse to not pay employees and correct the social injustices and inequalities in our so called civilised society

]]>
By: Poverty Pimp https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-5/#comment-700309 Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:09:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-700309 If the WCA tickbox “medical assesment” works so well,why not role it out right across the NHS Kate ? Who needs doctors anyway now that Prof Harrington & Co have “improved” the thing so much.

But seriously lets move on to the real reason why Kate and the Labour Party won’t ditch WCA.The answer to this surely has to be either you don’t trust millions of your fellow citizens desire to stack shelves in Poundland,or Maximus & New Labour have done a backroom deal.Which is it ?

]]>
By: Caroline Molloy https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-5/#comment-627299 Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:01:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-627299 There are some half decent suggestions here – but why won’t Labour just admit (like the Green Party) that whatever scheme of assessing and supporting disabled people is brought in, it should be publicly, not privately provided?

Here’s a bit from this week’s Green Party statement:

“The Work Capability Assessment has proved a very expensive disaster in both financial and human terms. It must be abolished and replaced with a system that truly reflects the needs and aspirations of sick and disabled people. Those who cannot work must receive the support they need.”

“It is unnecessary to pay hundreds of millions of pounds to private companies like Atos and Maximus, when sick and disabled people, and their own NHS doctors, can tell us what they need. Public services should be run for the common good, not private profit.”

http://greenparty.org.uk/news/2014/11/03/green-party-condemns-three-pronged-government-attack-on-sick-and-disabled

]]>
By: eviltories https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-4/#comment-626243 Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:41:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-626243 from what I’ve seen this Maximus is going to be worse than Atos, if that is even possible. just like Unum, they’ve helped strip away insurance claims and needed benefits from millions of Amercans. Now it’s time for us Brits to suffer the same fate.

]]>
By: Leon Wolfeson https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-4/#comment-620699 Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:29:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-620699 In reply to Chriss’y Christmas Red.

Actually a lot of medic’s no longer swear an oath.
They are, however, held to the professional standards the GMC puts forward.

]]>
By: Chriss'y Christmas Red https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-4/#comment-619737 Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:57:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-619737 In reply to Leon Wolfeson.

couldn’y agree more, all who sign up for this disgusting treatment of patient’s should be prosecuted , they sign an oath to alway’s put the patient 1st.

]]>
By: Chriss'y Christmas Red https://leftfootforward.org/2014/10/labour-demand-big-improvements-to-work-capability-assessments/comment-page-4/#comment-619731 Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:55:00 +0000 https://leftfootforward.org/?p=89692#comment-619731 In reply to TimRegency.

fully agree x

]]>