I have read up on it. I’m citing sections you willfully refuse to read.

Who is the “denier” in this context.

Oh just read up on this, will you?

“”green jobs”? That’s an extremely dangerous myth, especially when talking
about an industry that is fundamentally subsidized and is unproductive”

Similar to the perpetual war on everything industry,
Stealing, Carbon Tax Extorting, Corruption increases the economy.

” IPCC say firmly that climate change is significantly caused by human activity and is a serious and urgent issue.”

And if they said anything different they’d be out of a job !!!

AR5 says that the worst outcomes are highly uncertain.

The main line of evidence for these are the RCPs. The technical summary clearly states: “The scenarios should be considered plausible and illustrative, and do not have probabilities attached to them.”

You can see it for yourself but I’m sure you’d rather continue to bleat ignorance and selective blindness.

Have you actually taken in the thrust of the whole report rather than pathetic cherry picking?

I’m citing directly from it. You appear to go blind at that point.

Have you consulted table 12.4 in AR5 yet?

“Wrong about the green jobs and the productivity”

Spanish “Green jobs” in fact a job killer:
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/finance/2011/november/spains-green-disaster-a-lesson-for-america/

“The subsidies for renewables do not come out of taxes though.”

– They are subsidised primarily through costs passed on directly to the consumer.

Wrong about the green jobs and the productivity. All energy companies / producers get subsidised in one form or fashion. Nuclear, Oil, Gas, Wave, Solar, and Wind.

The subsidies for renewables do not come out of taxes though.