The fact that one of their directors, Pascal Hustings, flies between his home in Luxembourg and the office in Netherlands and has been for a number of years shows that they don’t care about the environment or global warming. They only care about increasing the size and influence of Greenpeace, all to increase their salaries.

He’s right. For the wrong reason.

That’d be their opposition to nuclear power.

That’s based on unrealistic propositions based in turn on unrestricted fracking, your name’s rather a giveaway.

If there was a carbon tax, the choice for base load would be natural gas, not coal. =

Greenpeace are for the 1% and not for the environment? They can reasonably be criticised for many things, but this is just a silly and paranoid view.

They might be international, but they only work for the rich in the west. They do their best to stop developing countries develop. Look at how GP stopped a hydro scheme in Chile and hinder India as it increases it’s energy output to make its economy grow. GP are pro the 1%. GP are not for the environment.

As for being locked up by the Russians, the Ruskies do everything to further the selling of their gas. GP haven’t stopped the Russians drilling for gas, its just a publicity exercise to get my donations. GP have stopped fracking in the UK though and that benefits the Russians. Both ways the Russians win, plausible deniability over the Arctic Sunrise case and a market for their gas in Europe because no UK gas.

This is tripe. Greenpeace is an international organization, not one solely involved in the UK. Have you not noticed that they campaign on international issues, and that several of their activists were recently locked up by the Russians?

Greenpeace are so worried about the UK’s affect on global climate yet they do nothing to stop China’s affect on the climate. The UK’s affect is less than 1%, yet the vast majority of anthropogenic climate change is by China and Russia. Greenpeace go out of their way to make the UK the nasty one when they do nothing at all at stopping China from filling the atmosphere with CO2. If Greenpeace was really bothered about the climate and the environment they would be in China committing terrorist, sorry protection, acts to stop China’s development of coal power stations. You’d think that Greenpeace are China’s puppets, not Russia’s.

That Greenpeace are bothered about the UK’s 1% but not China is like the way they are bothered about fracking which creates fractures in the rock nanometers in size tens of thousands of meters underground yet they do nothing to stop the bigger holes in the ground via which CO2 polluting fuel is extracted. Coal to you and me. Why aren’t Greenpeace actively picketing and closing down coal mines NOW?

So you have no answer to my points. Just nonsense, an attempt at making light of raising the power bills sharply for the poor.

So sorry you cannot possible consider other views, have to ignore the facts which don’t suit your mantras – good exclusionary orwellian thought practice there from you.