Comments on: Britain should take our share of Syrian refugees

By: Suada

Suada — Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:46:00 +0000

In reply to S&A. Indeed, but I think much of the Conservative party also voted against the measure, so it is not only Labor to blame.

By: Alec

Alec — Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:11:00 +0000

In reply to Sparky. If only to stem the flow of work experience jihadists from this country who'd return to put their skills to domestic use. ~alec

By: Sparky

Sparky — Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:27:00 +0000

Why do we have to get involved at all?

By: swatnan

swatnan — Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:06:00 +0000

A small token number of asylum seekers won’t make the slightest difference. What will is for Britain to come out strongly against the Islamoficist rebels, and put an end to misery.
The truth is that Arab Democracy is not the same as Westminster Democracy, and the sooner Britain realises that the better for all.

By: S&A

S&A — Wed, 22 Jan 2014 18:54:00 +0000

Five months ago Labour helped veto military intervention that could have forced Assad to the negotiating table, ending this madness in Syria.

And now Miliband, Cooper, Alexander et al are getting on their high horse over a problem that they have actively helped exacerbate.

If they were honest, they would admit that they have played a significant role in facilitating Assad’s war against his people, and the horrors that have ensued. The Labour party has blood on its hands. Shame on all.