The global community should support those battling extremism in Thailand

It’s time for the global community of democrats - whether on the left or the right - to stand shoulder to shoulder with those battling extremism in Thailand.

Andrew Spooner is a London-based blogger who writes regularly on Thai politics

Mention Thailand and most people will think of beaches, backpackers, Buddhism and its famous tourism industry. But you can bet as British tourists pack their sun-cream and beach-towels for a Winter holiday they won’t be thinking of one particular ‘F’ word – fascism.

Yet, last week, amidst the worst violence Thailand has witnessed in several years, the word ‘fascism‘ was uttered by a leading group of progressive Thai thinkers and academics.

In the shadow of protests led by Suthep Thuagsuban, a former ‘Democrat’ party deputy prime minister who is tainted not only with highly credible claims of corruption dating back to the 1990s, but who is also awaiting to be indicted for the murder of pro-democracy protesters in 2010, these thinkers/academics had come together to form the Alliance For the Defence of Democracy (AFDD).

Suthep, who resigned from the Democrat Party only last month, is still closely allied to his former boss and former PM, the present Democrat Party leader, Abhisit Vejjajiva (Abhisit, who is also a British citizen and Old Etonian, is a close friend of London Mayor, Boris Johnson), who was himself indicted for the 2010 murders only last week.

It is quite easy to see how the AFDD came to use the ‘F’ word. Suthep’s People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) protest movement is made up of senior Democrat Party figures, Thai aristocrats, the super-rich and Bangkok’s middle classes all of whom are desperate to cling onto the status and power they’ve enjoyed for so long.

The PDRC’s avowed programme has morphed from preventing a controversial amnesty bill – the bill was dropped in mid-November – through to its present aim of ‘stopping’ the February 2014 general election called by the 2011 general election-landslide-winning Thai PM, Yingluck Shinawtra.

Instead the PDRC is seeking to impose a ‘People’s Council‘ – a wholly appointed body drawn from Thailand’s elite – on the country in order to enact what the PDRC calls ‘reforms’. These reforms include, among various vague proposals to ‘stop corruption’, forbidding what the PDRC calls Yingluck’s ‘populist policies’ or, more accurately, what The Economist calls good old-fashioned Keynesian economics‘.

In an article in the Bangkok Post entitled ‘Academics brand people’s council ‘fascism‘, the AFDD were damning in their analysis of the PDRC. The Post quoted Piyabut Saengkanokkul, an AFDD member, who said that

“The idea of setting up a people’s council comprising members of various professions was an idea inherited from fascist corporatism, as seen in Italy during the period of Benito Mussolini’s fascist dictatorship.” 

You don’t have to delve too deep to see who is backing the PDRC’s “fascism”. In fact, many Thai aristocrats and super-wealthy openly boast of their disdain for democracy, accompanying this derision with sneering contempt for ordinary Thai voters.

A recent Reuters article examined the Thai aristos and billionaires who have taken a full and active part in the PDRC protests. Reuters’ damning expose partly focuses on one Chitpas Bhirombhakdi an “heiress to a $2.6 billion family fortune” and a Democrat Party spokesperson who has been in the forefront of the protests. Recently Chitpas was quoted in another newspaper stating that ordinary and poor Thais don’t have a “true understanding of democracy…especially in the rural areas”.

Of course Chitpas’ Democrat Party – the absolute bastion of the Thai establishment – have never won a parliamentary majority with their last semblance of success coming over twenty years ago when they managed to become the largest party in the Thai parliament with 21 per cent of the vote.

Since then Abhisit seized power in what was widely termed a ‘judicial coup‘ in 2008 – an act which later led to huge pro-democracy protests in 2010 and the brutal slaughter of almost 100 Thai civilians of whose murder he know stands charged – which was followed by PM Yingluck’s huge landslide election victory in 2011.

And now, unable to win an election, this once seemingly ‘liberal’ party – it’s simply shameful that the UK Liberal Democrats are allied and connected directly to the Thai Democrat Party via the Liberal International – have now veered towards political extremism.

Once the darlings of Bangkok’s notoriously tepid international media corps, articles are now appearing in the global media exposing the Abhisit-led ‘Democrats’ as the anti-democracy activists they’ve become. Time magazine ran a searing article entitled ‘Thailand’s Democrat Party Is Hilariously Misnamed‘, whilst Associated Press speared Abhisit’s party with this single line – ‘The enemy of the Democrat Party? It’s democracy‘.

So what next? Suthep has now taken to threatening PM Yingluck’s 11year old son from the protest stage whilst his acolytes have said they will lead a mob to ‘storm’ the US Embassy. The PDRC, who have vowed to stop the February 2014 general election, still rely on the support of Abhisit’s Democrats who look increasingly likely to boycott the elections. And, waiting in the wings, is the notoriously coup-happy Thai Army.

The experienced and widely-published Bangkok-based German photojournalist, Nick Nostitz, who has been covering Thailand’s political upheavals for the last decade – he was recently singled out for physical attack by the PDRC and then later produced an exceptional report on PDRC attacks on a pro-democracy Red Shirt rally – told me this about possible future Thai Army involvement.

“After the PDRC met the top brass on Saturday, it looks that presently the military still refuses to intervene any further than offering itself as a facilitator for possible negotiations. However, the Thai military is notoriously secretive in their decision making processes, next week the configuration could completely change again.”

Thailand stands at crossroads – the potential for civil war is now obvious and fascism is rearing its ugly head. It’s time for the global community of democrats – whether on the left or the right – to stand shoulder to shoulder with those battling extremism in Thailand.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

27 Responses to “The global community should support those battling extremism in Thailand”

  1. Simon Churchill

    Total absolute bollocks. You sound worse than any member of the MOB full of lies and most probably enjoying being courted by Thai elite not wanting to lose out to real democracy. You sound just like some Right wing Norwegian Birth Control NGOs I met in Bangkok, are you one???

  2. Simon Churchill

    Nui wants to remind you that Abhisit
    Vejjajiva Abhisit is not just a British Citizen, but was born in UK he was born on August 3, 1964 in
    Newcastle. Thus he should not have held
    position of Prime Minister.

  3. Auckland, NZ

    The majority of the international media have always tried to paint the protest as a war between the rich and the poor, which is a misconception. This is a protest against injustice and corruption of Yingluck’s political party, who have used their position in the government for personal gains instead of helping the country. If this was ever about the protesters trying to hold on to “wealth and power”, it would’ve happened long before this, why would they wait two years? And let’s not forget the Southern Thais who are also supporting the protest, the majority of them are not rich.
    Remember that the protest was only sparked by the attempt of her party to introduce the amnesty bill which would wipe clean all criminal convictions against their former party leader/ Yingluck’s own brother, including corruption charges and the murder of 2,500 people during the war on drugs in 2003 – of which half of the people executed had nothing to do with the drug trade/use on any level. Let’s also not forget when her party held a press conference publically rejecting the constitutional courts ruling that their charter amendment draft was unconstitutional and illegal. Any government which uses their majority in parliament to deny the justice system are illegitimate, and all those involved should be charged for it. Anyone with the slightest sense of decency would be appalled by the attempt of her party at abusing their power in such a way, it is immoral and unethical. Just because you were democratically elected, does not give you the right to abuse the system.

  4. promsop

    Are you sure the idea of a class struggle between rich and poor is fully a misconception? I would agree with you that this is a simplification and that many other factors enter the game. Yet the class struggle is part of the problem in Thailand: it is part of the rhetoric from both sides and account for many of the hatred. The anti-government protesters have made humiliating comments on the rural poors (it is coming up again and again, that poor people are not smart enough to be full citizen, buffalos, greedy and so on); and many rural people supporting Yingluck see Suthep and his supporters as a bunch of arrogant upper-classes who would not let go of their privileges.
    I also think that many anti-government protesters do not realize the impact that some of their statements can have for other Thais and worldwide: they do not see the “class” component in it, how patronizing it seems. I don’t remember which speakers (quoted in reuters) stated that protesters first had to educate their “maids and drivers”: to me it seemed so much like Marie-Antoinette (Louis XVI’s wife in France just before the revolution) proposing her cake (brioche) to the people of Paris in a hunger strike. And from the accounts I get from my relatives and friends in Thailand, the patronizing really hurts the feeling of many thais.
    So yes maybe, some or many protesters do not think they are in the street to steal the poor; Yet, the public face that they are showing today reveal the powerful class structure in Thailand and make it unbearable for many thais.

  5. Brown Note

    Ahhhhh, Andrew Spooner. Yes I vaguely remember this name being at the top of some other boring, misinformed, poorly written pieces during the 2010 protests. You sir, are just as clueless now as you were then. You are the type of foreign reporter who perpetuate the “farang will never understand Thai culture” stereotype. In fact, many of us have been here for a long time and do understand Thai culture very well. You are not one of them. For those of you who want to know how “voting” works in most Isan villages, just ask your bargirl GF. Democracy, despite what the West loves to think, is a flawed system, and does not work when the majority are corrupt.

Comments are closed.