What does the SNP have to hide?

Rosemary_Agnew

Scotland’s Information Commissioner has warned that complex changes to the way that public services are delivered are harming the public’s ability to access information in the way that they should be able to.

Launching her annual report, Rosemary Agnew has warned that it:

“is simply not acceptable that citizens’ rights continue to be eroded through complex changes in the delivery of services.”

The report, published today notes that:

  • Publishing the report Ms Agnew explained:The Commissioner’s office received 524 appeals in 2011/12, compared with 424 the previous year (a 23% increase).
  • 77% of appeals came from ordinary members of the public, 12% from media and 6% from commercial or private organisations.
  • The share of appeals relating to the Scottish Government and Scottish Parliament increased to 28%, compared to 15% the previous year. The share of appeals relating to local government remained steady at 45% of the total caseload.
  • The number of appeals against Scottish ministers increased by 40 to 110 in 2011-12, most of which were settled without investigation.
  • In those cases where Ms Angew was forced to issue a ruling, 23 cases went against the Scottish Government. A further six were partially upheld, while 15 went in favour of ministers.

“The current economic situation is leading to an increase in FOI requests to authorities, as people naturally want to understand the reasons behind decisions that affect them. At the same time, authorities are finding themselves with fewer resources to respond. My priority as Commissioner is to help the public make better targeted, more effective requests, while also developing resources to support public authorities in responding to those requests faster and more efficiently.

However, an ever-growing concern is the loss of rights occurring through the delivery of public services by “arms-length” organisations and third parties. FOI was introduced for a reason – to ensure that the delivery of public services and the spending of public money is transparent, open and accountable. It is simply not acceptable that citizens’ rights continue to be eroded through complex changes in the delivery of services. This must be looked at as an immediate priority.”

Her comments come as the Scottish Parliament  is considering the Freedom of Information (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill to  amend provisions of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 relating to the effect of various exemptions and the time limit for certain proceedings.

With judges having already ruled that correspondence between Prince Charles and Government Ministers should be made public, Scotland’s Information Commissioner told the committee scrutinising the Bill at Holyrood  that amendments within the Bill to keep secret correspondence between the Royal Family and Scottish Ministers represented a “worrying precedent.”

Responding to the annual report, a spokesperson for the Scottish Government has said:

“It is for individual Scottish public authorities to develop their own approach to handling FOI requests, in accordance with the FOI Act and it is a matter for the commissioner to judge how they are dealing with FOI requests.

“However, as with any process, there is always room for improvement and the Scottish government will be happy to work with the commissioner to share good practice and make improvements where possible.

“On the subject of extending coverage to other organisations, the Scottish government has been clear that, after we have completed parliamentary scrutiny of the current bill, we want to consider the issue of extension of coverage and have an open discussion to inform any future decisions.”

However, in the week that the Scottish Government formally lodged a legal appeal against a ruling by the Information Commissioner that they should publish all information related to their assertions on the status of an independent Scotland within the EU, opposition parties have been quick to turn on the SNP.

Accusing the nationalists of contemptible behaviour, Paul Martin, Scottish Labour’s Parliamentary Business Manager declared:

“The fact that the number of complaints from members of the public about the SNP Government has almost doubled in a year is symptomatic of the SNP’s obsession with secrecy.

“The increasing number of Scots having to drag information from the SNP Government kicking and screaming is deeply worrying.

“Coming in the same week as the SNP Government spending hundreds of thousands of pounds going to court to stop publishing its legal advice, I have little faith in the SNP opening up more decision-making in Scotland to public scrutiny.

The Freedom of Information Act is a pillar of our democracy and the SNP is treating it with utter contempt.

Scottish Lib Dem Leader, Willie Rennie was equally critical of the SNP, arguing that “the fog of secrecy enveloping the SNP government grows thicker by the day” he called on the SNP to “change course now, stop the costly legal action and extend the regime to include other public bodies that spend public money.”

4 Responses to “What does the SNP have to hide?”

  1. RolftheGanger

    And just how many of the doubling of FOI requests – is down to dumped Labourites going on ‘fishing’ trips; in a desperate attempt to regain relevance in the political arena?

  2. Newsbot9

    That’s called the price of democracy. Are you unwilling to pay it?

    (And you can start reducing those costs by sharing more information by default..)

  3. RolftheGanger

    Having generated many FOI queries In the past, I support the system.
    As does the current government, introducing legislative improvements.

    Which is quite different to the point I actually made about the statistics being presented as if the increase was some kind of negative to the SNP Government. As I pointed out, it is about the desperate search for relevance from the dumped Labourites. A point confirmed in Parliament yesterday. 14% of the increase came from one Labour researcher – who hid behind anonymity!!

    So much for the seekers after ‘openness’
    One rule for them and another for other people.

    Trying t0 build a narrative about “secrecy” to attack the SNP is not going to wash. But it does point to the poverty of options in the Unionist “Tory Westminster – Better Together” glove puppets for continued Tory domination of Scotland.

  4. Newsbot9

    So you “support” the system, but in fact are simply chanting your mantra about how it’s so evil that the Tories are dominating Scotland, when in fact you’re helping them.

    Right. Typical separatist nonsense. When you make up your mind what you stand for, rather than just spitting on people who believe in Britain, get back to me.

Leave a Reply