Comments on: Good news on Heathrow but Lib Dems to abstain on nuclear https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/ Left Foot Forward is the home for UK progressives. We provide evidence-based analysis on British politics, news and policy. Fri, 14 May 2010 11:09:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.5 By: Mr. Sensible https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/comment-page-3/#comment-24801 Fri, 14 May 2010 11:09:24 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24801 I don’t think replacing air passenger duty with some kind of flight tax is a good idea. I think it should be increased; air travel has been undertaxed, but replacing it as this government wants to do may put more pressure on airlines to fill flights which could result in more double-booking.

]]>
By: James Chan https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/comment-page-2/#comment-24646 Thu, 13 May 2010 22:19:37 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24646 RT @leftfootfwd: Good news on Heathrow but Lib Dems to abstain on nuclear http://bit.ly/at4du3

]]>
By: good https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/comment-page-2/#comment-24637 Thu, 13 May 2010 21:28:04 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24637 Good news on Heathrow but Lib Dems to abstain on nuclear | Left … http://bit.ly/cnA6Oj

]]>
By: norbert https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/comment-page-2/#comment-24589 Thu, 13 May 2010 19:34:29 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24589 nothing wrong with being a climate change sceptic. they may turn out to be wrong but only people without an understanding of science would refer to them as ‘nutters’ (though they may be for other reasons).

]]>
By: blogs of the world https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/comment-page-2/#comment-24585 Thu, 13 May 2010 18:28:12 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24585 The parties have seen eye-to-eye in this area on scrapping the Heathrow expansion plans, … http://reduce.li/t5vwg6 #foot

]]>
By: Good news on Heathrow but Lib Dems to abstain on nuclear « The best Labour blogs https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/comment-page-2/#comment-24531 Thu, 13 May 2010 17:02:20 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24531 […] More… […]

]]>
By: Luis Hid https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/#comment-24515 Thu, 13 May 2010 15:29:59 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24515 Good news on Heathrow but Lib Dems to abstain on nuclear | Left …: The parties have seen eye-to-eye in this area… http://bit.ly/a3h20h

]]>
By: George Kata https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/#comment-24511 Thu, 13 May 2010 15:15:33 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24511 Good news on Heathrow but Lib Dems to abstain on nuclear | Left …: The parties have seen eye-to-eye in this area… http://bit.ly/9LMR5s

]]>
By: Joss Garman https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/#comment-24465 Thu, 13 May 2010 13:55:49 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24465 I should add that the headline is slightly misleading in that my own view is that nuclear is a dangerous distraction from the real clean energy solutions to energy security and climate change.

]]>
By: House Of Twits https://leftfootforward.org/2010/05/good-news-on-heathrow-but-lib-dems-to-abstain-on-nuclear/#comment-24460 Thu, 13 May 2010 13:40:42 +0000 https://www.leftfootforward.org/?p=13239#comment-24460 RT @leftfootfwd Good news on Heathrow but Lib Dems to abstain on nuclear: http://bit.ly/at4du3

]]>