Comments on: Cameron fails to say he’s for “gay or straight”

By: Tribal voters show Tory manifesto pandering to core support « Rate My Tory

Tribal voters show Tory manifesto pandering to core support « Rate My Tory — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:10:01 +0000

[…] the indifference of Tory voters towards equal gay rights might explain Cameron’s non-inclusion of homosexuals in his ‘Great Ignored’ speech, not to mention the party’s hideous record on the […]

By: David Galea

David Galea — Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:00:48 +0000

Adultery destroys lives and is immoral, so should we make that illegal too?

By: Look Left – The Week in Fast Forward | Left Foot Forward

Look Left – The Week in Fast Forward | Left Foot Forward — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:31:59 +0000

[…] to the announcement of the election on Tuesday, Mr Cameron had only said he was for “young or old, rich or poor, black or white” but not […]

By: James E Pennington

James E Pennington — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:16:27 +0000

May i also reiterate Rory’s question about how you’dall feel if it were a muslim bnb that had not allowed a gay couple a double room? It does seem like there are double standards here, and for reasons I can’t fully understand.

By: James E Pennington

James E Pennington — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:14:02 +0000

I’m a LAbour member and a committed Christian and I am so upset by the way the Labour Party seems to undermine many Christian values at every opportunity. TO repeal the Waddington Amendment which would then make it illegal for a youth worker to tell his youth group about God’s biblically given view of the right framework for sexual relationships.. ie marriage.. This isn’t Labour.. it’s control freakery masquerading as the one thing it isn’t.. Liberalism.

The outcry of horror and pressure from the gay lobby over a genuine concern over the rights of religious people v gay people.. you’d think Grayling had suggested slaughtering the firstborn or something!! PLease please please Labour party.. don’t make it impossible for me to support you. I love all people in Christ, allpeople.. but I have to be free to preach the gospel and live it.. In a choice between Labour and God, who d’ya think might win??

By: scouser

scouser — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:25:45 +0000

regarding the people who offended the gay couple, they would allow them to sleep in their home and did not throw them out, if i threw gordon brown out of the pub i run would i be in the wrong

By: lennylf

lennylf — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:29:12 +0000

Cameron ignores the “Great Ignored”
Memory loss for a potential premiere who is still in his early 40s? Perhaps dementia is setting in early for Cameron ; or maybe he is an opportunist hypocrite , and has decided to follow the , “dont do what I say , do what I do ” philosophy ,and just ignore the gay society , just to support Chris Grayling’s comments.
As for a Jewish B&B ignoring Muslim Customers ? Is the person who posted the suggestion not just a tide bit encouraging prejudice just to Support Cameron’s silence over his hand picked shadow cabinet minister Chris Grayling ?

By: Mark M

Mark M — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:12:15 +0000

Ahh, the Grayling story again. Always got to bring that up. His words were “if it’s a question of somebody who’s doing a B&B in their own home, that individual should have the right to decide who does and who doesn’t come into their own home”.

Are those such controversial vews to hold? Would we expect a Jewish B&B owener to be welcoming of, say, a group of Muslims or vice versa? Remember, we’re talking about coming into a person’s home, that happens to be a B&B, not a hotel. Now would LFF be so critical of Grayling if the B&B owner in question had been a Muslim refusing two gay men?

As for Cameron leaving out “gay or straight”, that’s clearly an error of memory. You’d have to be clinically insane, or perhaps Labour voter, to think otherwise.

By: Fred Blogs

Fred Blogs — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:53:02 +0000

Ignoring part of the “Great Ignored”. A bit of a false start for Dave.

By: MAJOLY

MAJOLY — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:10:49 +0000

In his speech, David Cameron failed to address the race equality issue. This is the change we need.