One headline, three glaring inaccuracies
Doctors trained in other countries are more likely to face competence investigations than those trained in Britain, a new study has shown.
The authors identified that Bangladeshi doctors are 13 times more likely to be investigated, while those trained in Egypt and Nigeria were next. Doctors from the EU are also more likely to be investigated.
However, the researchers also ‘urge caution in the interpretation of our findings,’ acknowledging a plurality of potential causes, the possibility of confounding factors and the need for further examination. They insist that the vast majority of doctors in the UK are competent and that patients should not be concerned.
So the Daily Mail, with its trademark rigour and caution, has announced that ‘Foreign doctors are 13 TIMES more likely to be investigated for incompetence because of problems grasping English.’
In the headline alone, there are three major misrepresentations. Firstly, there is significant variation among doctors of different nationalities, including that South Africans are no more likely to face investigation. So the ‘foreign doctors’ claim is inaccurate.
Secondly, only Bangladeshi-trained doctors are 13 times more likely to face investigations. The numbers for doctors of all other nationalities are lower.
Thirdly, while language skills were identified as one potential cause of the disparity, the authors repeatedly emphasise that they cannot conclusively establish a cause for the phenomenon.
If an unusually high number of problems are arising among foreign-trained doctors, that does of course require attention and the paper suggests that in the context of free movement for medics there may be a need for more effective international standards or assessments.
However, they also flag that prejudice is part of the picture, since non-UK trained doctors and BME doctors are more vulnerable to being complained about, and are more likely to report harassment and discrimination from both patients and colleagues.
That sort of panic and prejudice can only be inflamed by xenophobic Mail reporting that shows no regard for the facts. The NHS could not function without foreign-trained doctors or other healthcare professionals, and by attacking them the Mail is undermining the health service itself.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
4 Responses to “Daily Mail blatantly misrepresents study on competence of foreign doctors”
Michael
So, the Daily Wail tells lies. so why is that “News?”
spiv
“However, they also flag that prejudice is part of the picture, since non-UK trained doctors and BME doctors are more vulnerable to being complained about”
What, in the same way that burglars are more ‘vulnerable’ to arrest for burglary than non burglars?
Daily Mail blatantly misrepresents study on competence of foreign doctors | Left Foot Forward | kickingthecat
[…] https://leftfootforward.org/2017/04/daily-mail-blatantly-misrepresents-study-on-competence-of-foreig… […]
Fred
The Left’s position on immigration:
1. Immigration has only benefits.
2. Immigration should never be reduced, only increased.
3. Anybody who seeks debate about immigration is a racist.