Theresa May is no safe pair of hands – her corporation tax cuts couldn’t be more reckless

The UK won't profit from a race to the bottom on corporate tax

Theresa May PMQs

 

For a prime minister who is often described as cautious and ‘on top of the detail’, Theresa May’s pledge on corporation tax could hardly be more reckless.

By brazenly stating that the wants the UK to have ‘the lowest corporate tax rate in the G20’, just days after Donald Trump had strongly hinted that the US might cut its rate to 15 per cent, she has potentially committed to taking a staggering five percentage points off our current corporate tax rate.

It is hard to think of a clearer or more egregious example of the race to the bottom on tax. Yet just last week, the European Parliament’s Panama Papers Committee, on which I sit, heard Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz giving evidence on how this race is leading to huge numbers of losers and very few winners.

Between 2004 and 2014, the average top corporation tax rate has dropped from 27.2 per cent to 18.6 per cent, and it is continuing to fall.

This reduction has not been cost-free. Nor has it painlessly made countries more competitive. On the contrary, cutting corporation tax leads to the tax burden being more heavily placed on other forms of taxation, most of which are paid by citizens and those companies which can’t simply relocate somewhere with a friendlier regime.

The Resolution Foundation has calculated that May’s reckless tax cut would cost the UK Treasury £10bn — a gap which will have to be filled. Furthermore, by rushing towards low tax rates May is legitimising behaviour by companies like Apple who form secretive tax arrangements with governments to escape paying their fair share.

Instead, the UK government should focus on ensuring that all companies operate on a level playing field, so that they are genuinely competing on innovation and quality, thus boosting productivity.  We should also deal with those issues that genuinely act as a brake on growth for companies, like the business rates system.

There are plans in place to create this level playing field, but they require political will if they are going to happen.  Right now, for instance, the EU is in the process setting up a blacklist of tax havens around the world, ahead of establishing a meaningful sanctions regime.  This could target countries like the Bahamas, where there is currently some €200bn sitting in their banks — that’s 26 times the GDP of the nation.

This should go hand in hand with other actions which I have called for in the past: a public register of who really owns a company or a trust; a requirement for companies to report publicly, broken down country-by-country, exactly where they make their profits and pay their tax; and a fair cross-border system of tax calculation that prevents companies like Starbucks playing one country’s tax regime off against another.

In her comments on corporate tax, May has inadvertently plumped to benefit the richest and leave all the rest of us to pick up the tab.

She has to be persuaded to change course, before the tax race to the bottom impoverishes us all.

Anneliese Dodds MEP is a member of the European Parliament economic and monetary affairs committee. Follow her on Twitter

See also: Theresa May abandons her one progressive promise – putting workers on boards

7 Responses to “Theresa May is no safe pair of hands – her corporation tax cuts couldn’t be more reckless”

  1. Michael WALKER

    ” fair cross-border system of tax calculation that prevents companies like Starbucks playing one country’s tax regime off against another”

    So you want to change the world’s agreed tax systems and make the EC change its won as well?

    And how long do you plan for that to happen?

    Based on history about 17 years.

  2. Chester Draws

    And yet Ireland was not impoverished by cutting corporate tax rates. So there’s somewhat more to it than you paint.

  3. Mike Stallard

    You assume two things which are very questionable:
    1. That if you reduce tax, then your tax take goes down. Counter intuitiveness dictates otherwise. These people have lawyers who are looking for the best bargain and they will ruthlessly pursue it.
    2. The State, through rigorous taxation will provide for the poor. It seems to me that it largely provides for the crooks and corrupt people who sit at the top and milk it.

  4. Seriallluncher

    I disagree. Corporation tax is about the most economically damaging tax in existence and hits everyone including the poor (jobs, wages and prices). It doesn’t actually raise very much tax relative to the cost. It would be better to drop it altogether and compensate if necessary with high value property tax.

  5. Craig Mackay

    Corporation tax really doesn’t work for the UK at present. Governments keep talking about doing something about it but nothing seems to happen. What is needed is a rather different approach to the whole business of getting profitable companies to pay a reasonable and fair level of tax. One of the most promising approaches is an infrastructure charge levied on the proportion of profits arising from the trade of a corporation in the UK. It is similar to Richard Murphy’s “Alternative Minimum Corporation Tax proposals”. An explanation of this, why it is fair and how it works can be found at: http://outsidethebubble.net/2016/10/20/fair-taxation-on-corporate-profits-2/

  6. Autumn Statement: Liveblog | Left Foot Forward

    […] Dodds MEP wrote for Left Foot Forward on the recklessness of this […]

  7. Pat Pending

    Dear Limp Foot Forward. All corporate tax should be removed. This may be hard to accept if you see companies as inherently evil or your politics clog your brain. All corporate tax is paid for by consumers through an element of the product price. Companies can not, ever, pay taxes, only people can. So the tax collected via companies should be removed and the tax collected through existing and (marginally) more efficient routes of VAT, dividend tax and employees earnings taxation. All of the tax loop holes and allowances will disappear overnight and the government can recover higher taxes as a result. But who is brave enough to step away from dogma driven history and bitterness towards companies to do it? Are you?

Leave a Reply