Committee calls for radical measures, warning funding is not enough
Britain’s flood defences need a radical overhaul to protect communities at risk, with the current ‘fragmented and inefficient’ policy ‘unlikely to deliver sufficient protection in future decades’.
That’s the view of MPs on the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, who today called for the creation of a national floods commissioner for England and a new English Rivers and Coastal Authority to take over from the Environment Agency.
They also said water could be stored on farmland to reduce the risk of flooding with incentives for farmers, and developers who flout planning should be forced to pay for the costs of flood damage.
Other suggestions were grants for small businesses who can’t afford insurance and simpler flood risk warnings.
‘Some five million people in England are at risk of flooding,’ said committee chair Neil Parish. ‘Winter 2015-16 broke rainfall records.
‘Storms Desmond, Eva and Frank disrupted communities across northern parts of the UK, with Desmond alone costing the UK more than £5 billion.’
“We propose a radical alternative to the government’s national flood resilience review’s limited solutions to the current fragmented, inefficient and ineffective flood risk management arrangements.”
He added: ‘Flood management must include much wider use of natural measures such as leaky dams, tree planting and improved soil management. And some areas of farmland should be used to store flood water.
‘Building regulations must be tightened up to help flood-proof our properties if a voluntary code is not agreed by the end of this year. Developers who flout planning rules in high flood risk areas must also be penalised.’
This was welcomed by Friends of the Earth, whose climate campaigner Guy Shrubsole said:
“The Environment Committee clearly understands that better management of our rivers and waterways needs more joined-up thinking – not less. This includes working with nature across entire river catchments and dealing with climate change.
Government should heed MPs’ welcome proposals to tackle flooding at root – but not distracting proposals to break up the Environment Agency.”
A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the government has invested £2.5 billion on flood defence schemes to protect 300,000 homes by 2021, including £12.5 million on mobile defences like barriers and high-volume pumps.
He added: ‘We are already implementing many of the suggestions this report makes, such as managing watercourses across entire catchment areas, but see no need for structural changes.’
Labour’s shadow environment secretary Rachael Maskell said:
“There is a real urgency required in the government’s approach to flooding. Last winter Storm Desmond, Frank and Eva in particular, had a devastating impact on families, businesses and communities.
There is still a lack of confidence in schemes to protect businesses and the £12.5 million pledged to temporary flood barriers will not bring the long-term protection required.”
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
3 Responses to “MPs say reform ‘ineffective’ flood defences that leave five million at risk”
Dr Evil
I live in East Anglia and about 4 miles from the lowest pub below sea level in England. It doesn’t flood around here, at least not more than an inch or two and only in some spots. That’s because we have the legacy of the marvellous Dutch hydro-engineers who drained the fens. They did this nearly 300 years ago. So why does any part of the country flood? Surely no-one was daft enough to allow houses to be built on river floodplaines?
David Lindsay
The money for Trident should go instead to flood defences, to civil nuclear power alongside the exploitation of our vast reserves of coal, and to properly paid and properly equipped Armed Forces. Rumour has it that that would still leave a bit. I am sure that we could think of some uses for that, too.
MPs want flood defence reforms – but ignore the best examples | Vox Political
[…] Source: MPs say reform ‘ineffective’ flood defences that leave five million at risk | Left Foot … […]