Top scientists defend EU freedom of movement

Science is a useful case study for the broader benefits free movement

Picture Shows:  Stephen Hawking on set of BBC Two drama 'Hawking'.
The story of the early years of world-renowned theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, is to be made into a one-off drama for BBC Two. Written by Peter Moffatt (Cambridge Spies), Hawking stars Benedict Cumberbatch as the young Stephen Hawking who, as a bright and ambitious PHD student at Cambridge University, is diagnosed with the debilitating motor neurone disease and given two years to live. Against the odds, he goes on to achieve worldwide acclaim and success, in particular with his astounding book A Brief History Of Time.  

Warning: Use of this copyright image is subject to Terms of Use of BBC Digital Picture Service.  In particular, this image may only be used during the publicity period for the purpose of publicising [BBC programme or BBC person’s name or other BBC output/activity here] and provided [BBC or other copyright owner] is credited. Any use of this image on the internet or for any other purpose whatsoever, including advertising or other commercial uses, requires the prior written approval of [the BBC or other copyright owner].


In a letter published in this morning’s Times, 150 Royal Society scientists have issued one of the clearest defences of European freedom of movement of the referendum campaign.

The academics, including Stephen Hawking and Astronomer Royal Martin Rees, suggest that:

“If the UK leaves the EU and there is a loss of freedom of movement of scientists between the UK and Europe, it will be a disaster for UK science and universities.”

They argue that some of the most promising young scientists working in Britain come from continental Europe, and that access to the shared pot of EU science funding enhances the UK’s capacity to attract top researchers and conduct valuable research.

In the face of Labour’s extraordinary silence on Europe, many progressives are disappointed that the government’s conservative, anti-immigrant case has dominated the debate.

As the argument between pro-Leave and pro-Remain Tories hinges on which side can more convincingly claim that their approach will cut immigration and refugee numbers, we haven’t heard a wholesale defence of freedom of movement.

But that is exactly what the Royal Society group has delivered, with its argument that the free movement of people ‘is as important for science as free trade is for market economics.’ Science, with its proud tradition of collaboration, diversity and collegiality, offers a useful case study for the broader benefits free movement.

Of course, the case against free movement is not built on antipathy towards French and German scientists, but on mistrust of unskilled eastern Europeans and desperate Syrians, Afghans and Eritreans.

However, in a debate that has been dominated by anti-migration sentiment, any bold defence of open borders is more than welcome.

Niamh Ní Mhaoileoin is editor of Left Foot Forward

2 Responses to “Top scientists defend EU freedom of movement”

  1. Steve

    A welcome interventon!

    You might also enjoy this on how the EU helps to promote democracy and stability

  2. Robert Petulengro

    I have just been teaching some Chinese students English. There were a lot of people in the room from the Baltic too. The Chinese were much more like us than the Baltics.
    Europe is so very limiting.
    I have every intention of visiting my family in Arabia, Singapore and Australia.
    So where does this balderdash about not visiting people in Europe come from please?
    And why do we need open borders?

Leave a Reply