The debate about Britain’s relationship with the EU is now open

There are democratic questions for both campaigns to answer

 

This week saw some welcome news for democratic reformers – national parliaments will be able to veto unwanted EU laws if they don’t have the backing of a majority of EU legislatures, under proposals announced by David Cameron and Donald Tusk on Tuesday.

A ‘red card’ system – where laws which do not have the support of elected parliaments can be vetoed – was one of our key recommendations in our recent report ‘Close the Gap: Tackling Europe’s Democratic Deficit’.

Those in favour of democratic reform of the EU have long called for this change. Elected parliaments need a much stronger role in EU law-making, and a ‘red card’ system is a positive step towards that goal.  

But this backing comes with a caveat: the ‘red card’ system shouldn’t just be a tool for ministers – it should be MPs’ voices that should be strengthened too, following scrutiny by relevant committees.

Whether we vote to stay or go, Tuesday’s announcement should be the start of a real debate about Britain’s democratic relationship with the EU. There are clearly major democratic issues with the EU which both sides of the referendum debate have to confront.

For a start, the ‘remain’ campaign needs to answer serious questions about whether UK citizens are adequately represented at the European level. The ‘red card’ reform is a good start, but much more needs to be done if we are going to close the gap between British people and the institutions of the European Union.

And there are democratic questions for the ‘leave’ campaign too. If Britain does vote to leave the EU, how will we ensure that British citizens and their elected government have influence over European issues, especially during what could be a two year transition before a full exit?  

After what would be a seismic political change, we would also need a citizen-led constitutional convention to look at how we move forward as a democracy.

Tuesday’s announcement opens up the debate on Britain’s democratic relationship with the EU. We want to see these issues remain at the centre of the referendum campaign – the British people deserve nothing less.

In 2014 the ERS published ‘Close the Gap: Tackling Europe’s Democratic Deficit’ which laid out 12 major recommendations on EU democratic reform. Read the full ‘Close the Gap’ report and recommendations here.

Josiah Mortimer is communications officer at the Electoral Reform Society

One Response to “The debate about Britain’s relationship with the EU is now open”

  1. David Lindsay

    The Labour Left was often far madder, both personally and politically, than the Communist Party, and that could be pretty far gone. In the same way, the Conservative Right is often, and even normally, far madder than UKIP, which is itself pretty far gone.

    Entirely predictably, the involvement of the pair of them is wreaking havoc in the campaign to leave the EU. They were both going to vote Out anyway, so there was never the slightest need to have them as active participants.

    But they are, so we are going to have to prepare ourselves for defeat. The key is now to maximise the anti-EU vote, in the hope of being able to force something even after we have lost the referendum: http://lanchesterreview.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/further-measures-to-assert-sovereignty.html.

    The opposition to the Iraq War paid a terrible price for allowing Trots and Islamists to make the running. That mistake is being repeated here.

Leave a Reply