Why we must start regulating religious schools

Parents who send their children to madrassahs or yeshivas have no guarantee that they are being cared for responsibly



As the captain of a cricket club, I occasionally pick young people to play in my team. Rightly, I had to be checked by the Disclosure and Barring Service to do this, and my fellow team-mates who coach our juniors have to complete additional safeguarding training. It seems fair enough to me – if parents are signing over their children to my supervision, they want to know I am accountable.

I was shocked to learn that parents who send their children to madrassahs or yeshivas are not afforded such courtesies, despite the fact that children are often under the duty of care of these institutions for more than six hours each week. Schools, or anyone who works with children for over 18 hours each week, are regulated, but these out-of-school settings are not.

The Department for Education has just closed the consultation period for new proposals to register, inspect, and, if necessary, sanction these institutions. The proposals want to protect young people from inadequate premises, unsuitable staff, poor management, corporal punishment, and the promotion of ideas that undermine British values or promote extremism. All of this is absolutely necessary in my book.

When Quilliam goes in to schools, we try to promote a ‘primary prevention’ approach. That is, not making an assessment of a child’s vulnerability or referring people to the Channel programme, but instead promoting things like human rights and critical thinking that can help everyone. However, there is little point in promoting such positive measures, unless we can guarantee a minimum standard for all young people that ensures they are safe when being educated. I am adamant that this must go for out-of-school settings as much as schools and colleges.

Beyond the physical safety of all young people, it is important to ensure that all children are given the best opportunity to actively contribute to society and are prepared for life in Britain in 2016. This means they should be protected from those who actively promote extremism, whose opposition to the universality of human rights does not prepare them at all.

It is therefore absolutely uncontroversial to see counter-extremism as safeguarding, and I welcome proposals that class promoting extremist views and undermining our fundamental values as unacceptable in these settings.

This basic level of oversight is not ‘snooping’, but taking overdue action that protects young people from harm. The majority of institutions which provide great services can take advantage of the extra resources and the opportunity to show how good their teaching is to parents and young people, how much they care about people attending their classes, and show the authorities that they are committed to the wider community.

The aim of these proposals is not to shut down madrassahs, yeshivas or Sunday schools, but rather to regulate them and safeguard all children. Therefore I would expand the measures available to schools after Ofsted inspects them – rather than focusing on shutting down premises that fail inspections and banning teachers from working with children in the future, I would urge compulsory courses to help them be better. Even at a basic level that must be good for the volunteers and staff who run these institutions.

But for those institutions that are the worst offenders, it is right that the government has recourse to sanction them. We know that the values, good and bad, instilled in young people stay with them for the rest of their lives and it is unacceptable that intolerance, bigotry and extremism have prospered in these ungoverned spaces. Not simply because such views may precede more violent extremism, whether carried out in Britain or abroad, but also because of the immeasurable impact these worldviews have on community cohesion, integration, and societal wellbeing.

The opposition of many religious schools to all counter-extremism work, without any engagement with the debate, acceptance of the scale of the problems and their various causes, nor a proposal of alternative solutions, will hold back those who run out-of-school settings. If we can agree on nothing else, we should at least be able to agree that the safety of all children is important and that we should actively take steps to give them the best start in life.

Jonathan Russell is head of policy at Quilliam

15 Responses to “Why we must start regulating religious schools”

  1. steroflex

    Once again, the Muslims – yes Muslims – are making it necessary for British people to lose their freedom. We have a Children’s Church run by two kind ladies. We have (Catholic) an extremely efficient child protection policy. But – hey – fair’s fair. We get inspected too.

  2. Rita pegg

    Jonathan, I agree totally, but alas, it must start at home, from a very young age, from the Parents. Parents from every ethnic background, who want to live in our wonderful UK. Then our schools take over. But every teaching centre, from all religions, must be checked, regularly. Keep up your great work.

  3. Tissue

    I find it shameful that your article focuses on ‘counter-extremism’ safeguarding, yet you have a picture of Jewish people as the introductory picture. Please remind me of the last Jewish terrorist atrocity/suicide bomber? If you are afraid to put the appropriate picture with this article, then you should leave the picture out altogether.

  4. Jingoistic

    Close all religious schools. Problem solved.

  5. jj

    Certainly not in the UK! Israel is entirely different, Jewish extremists burn down churches and mosques, much like Hindu extremists in India.

  6. martinmgraham

    Unfortunate choice of picture, makes me hesitate while recognizing that extremism in the jewish community is not new, Zionism ensured that. But also this is not just about religious schools, which are of course sectarian by nature, but also other institutions, like the boys scouts, very right wing and racist here in france. i think maybe we’ll get correct legislation when we stop considering children the property and therefore the responsibility of only their parents.

  7. Austin

    It’s still safer to be Muslim or Christian in Israel than it is to be Jewish in the UK

  8. Austin

    Curious- why did you choose a picture of Jews? Are you really trying to suggest that Jewish schools are the real problem?

  9. jj

    I’d say not, you only have to look at the thriving Jewish communities in Gateshead and Golders Green to see you’re wrong. If you replaced Israel with Afghanistan, Pakistan or Jordan, I would agree.

  10. Mukesh

    Only reason I could justify why the author chose to place a Jewish picture is to remove the stereotypical image of the general Islamic affront. Regardless of how it’s perceived by the reader we cannot dispute the absence of critical debate to challenge the religious dogmatic intrusion on young lives on their vulnerability is extremely dangerous and life changing.

  11. Austin

    The vast majority of hate crimes in the UK are against Jews, and Jews are leaving the UK in mass while the population of religious minorities grows in Israel

  12. jj

    Do you have stats? Worldwide it is Christians that are most widely persecuted. Not sure about the Uk. We are about as liberal as you can get towards religious minorities. Jews don’t deserve any hatred, what they have contributed to the UK has been nothing but beneficial. The pretty tiny population has lived very peacefully too.

  13. Austin

    I’ll do a search when I can, but I’m going off of the fact that Jews are the most attacked religious group in America, by far, and in France they make up 51% of all ethnic/racial hate crimes committed. Combined with the reports of an increase in hate crimes as of late I sort of put 2 and 2 together. I should’ve made it more obvious that that was an assumption and not a well-researched answer though

  14. Austin

    But you are right in that Christians are most persecuted worldwide

  15. Lamia

    The article mentions not wanting to shut down “madrassahs, yeshivas or Sunday schools”, which is an understandably tactful way of referring to the problem, though few will be under the delusion that many (or indeed any) yeshivas and Sunday schools in Britain are teaching extremism and churning out extremists.

    Left Foot Forward then garbles this in the subheader to imply that there is some kind of parity of threat from madrassahs and yeshivas. And as if that’s not enough daftness, it chooses to illustrate the article with… Jews.

    Of course.

    I had come to expect a bit better of Left Foot Forward. Evidently the ‘socialism of fools’ is too hard to resist.

Leave a Reply