Daily Express porn baron’s reasons for £1m UKIP splurge are a bit rich

UKIP an 'anti-establishment' party standing up to Vladimir Putin? Don't make us laugh

 

Defender of traditional Christian Britain / debaser of public morals Richard Desmond, owner of the Daily Express, Television X and Red Hot TV, has today lobbed £1.3million into the coffers of Nigel Farage’s UKIP, hailing the splurge on the front page of his newspaper

This is a bold move from a newspaper proprietor during an election campaign (Desmond is urging others to follow suit and donate), and the National Union of Journalists has condemned the showy price-tag when Express journalists have not seen a pay rise in seven years.

Thus the party of national tradition and patriotism is now bankrolled by the man behind Television X, ‘the best of British porn’. Rule Britannia etc.

tvxporn

But beyond that, Desmond’s reasons for switching his money from Labour (which he has funded in the past) to UKIP are a bit hard to stomach.

First and foremost, the millionaire claims he is backing Farage’s party to ‘shake up the Establishment’ (caps his). Says Desmond:

“I always have challenged the Establishment and I want to continue to challenge it. […]

“I am fed up with the complacency and cronyism and I’m fed up with the floppy-haired Eton club.”

Right. So why not support Labour or another left-wing party?

“I am also fed up with the champagne socialists who just tell people what they want to hear. UKIP is a thorn in their side. That is why I am doing this.

“I want them to carry on being a thorn in the side of the Tories and Labour.”

This conflation of ‘the establishment’ (that is, entrenched power) and political parties, by a soft-porn merchant and press baron, is as silly as his choice of rebel.

As the economist Chris Dillow wrote in an excellent piece in 2013, as the Dulwich-educated son of a stockbroker, Nigel Farage’s class background is ‘indistinguishable from Cameron’s or Clegg’s’.

He goes on to say that border controls, a flat tax, opposing gay marriage, cutting Brussels ‘red-tape’ (read: workers’ rights), and enough ‘reform’ of the welfare state to make Ian Duncan Smith blush, are an assault on individual liberty that shores up the power of the state and the rich.

Desmond’s other reason is just as laughable:

“I was concerned about the threat from Russia under President Vladimir Putin and was encouraged that Ukip want to spend 2 per cent of national income on defence and our Armed Forces.”

Farage even tried this one in the debate last night. Can this foe of Putin be the same man who said the EU had ‘blood on its hands’ over Ukraine, because ‘if you poke the Russian bear with a stick he will respond’? Who named Putin as the world leader he most admired? And whose party chairman Paul Nuttall recently blasted the EU for not recognising Putin’s annexation of Crimea?

If a party like this is our last line of defence against foreign tyrants, we really are in trouble.

This is before we even consider UKIP’s all-over-the-shop policies on immigration, or its race-baiting over a black plague of HIV-ridden African ‘health tourists’.

Arise then, Sir Farage of probably nowhere. King Richard the dirty anoints you his champion of the little guy.

Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter

70 Responses to “Daily Express porn baron’s reasons for £1m UKIP splurge are a bit rich”

  1. AlanGiles

    “an anti-pension fanatic”

    What the hell is that supposed to mean?. Keep taking the tablets mate.

  2. SgtVimes

    By removing their employment rights and putting their jobs at risk by leaving the EU? You think that’s an empty threat? You watch the likes of Nissan, Honda and the big banks relocate if we do.

  3. Cole

    Ah, the Telegraph, well known for accurate and objective reporting…

  4. Leon Wolfeson

    You know, you stereotype yourself.

  5. Guest

    “UR MAD JEW”, you scream, Lord Blagger.

    I can read your posts, the only tablets involved are at your side, and it seems you’re not taking them lately, given the degree of disassociation between your usernames posts.

    You also, of course, can’t actually address any of my other points.

  6. Leon Wolfeson

    Er? That’s entirely domestic.

  7. Guest

    So you’re lying. And you’re saying that your bigotry is pointless – right, but it’s still yours.

  8. JAMES MCGIBBON

    I just responded to your silly comment about peons.

  9. Leon Wolfeson

    ….By showing your stereotyping of yourself. Which you continue to do, by highlighting how accurate I was.

  10. JAMES MCGIBBON

    Do you have difficulty in obtaining large caps.

  11. Mary Ann

    ukip support Putin, seems a bit odd for an extreme right wing politician, or is this yet another ploy to try and convince people that he is not right wing. After loosing it against an audience he claims was left wing, nobody with any common sense would believe him.

  12. Mary Ann

    Supports Putin, you mean.

  13. Leon Wolfeson

    I don’t try and cap people in the first place.

  14. JAMES MCGIBBON

    You should.

  15. Leon Wolfeson

    No, I’m not interested in murder. So sorry.

  16. sarntcrip

    dream on another tory party of utter self interest farage vanity project

  17. sarntcrip

    torygraph well known for regurgitating tory press releases verbatim
    oh those lovely non dom barclay brothers

  18. sarntcrip

    tory cuts proves we’ve ignored that

  19. sarntcrip

    tories too few too

  20. sarntcrip

    democracy lol fptp is not democracy

Leave a Reply