The disastrous LBC interview changes nothing - we need to turn the heat back on the government that caused the housing crisis

 

Natalie Bennett should have been better prepared. That’s really all there is to take from her interview with LBC yesterday, in which she crumbled under scrutiny of her housing policies. It’s not that the whole Green Party is discredited, or that she is stupid, or that she has her sights set on ‘the economy being wrecked and much-loved traditions destroyed’.

We need a bit of perspective. The Greens have some bad policies and some good ones; as Zoe Williams writes in the Guardian today, Bennett’s main mistake was in trying to answer a question rather than describe her vision. Most politicians skirt around the questions they are asked in interviews, instead reiterating the part they are proudest of again and again. It is certainly not uncommon for interviewers to be unable to get hard figures out of their subjects.

The difference is that normally these evasions are delivered smoothly, and most speakers have been extensively polished by PR teams so that they know not to incriminate themselves with coughs and pauses. Natalie Bennett somehow missed this training and she’s paying the price in jeers from all sides.

But voters should not let the circus distract them from housing policies that desperately need changing.The Conservatives have many policies and plans for housing which ought to be bigger news than the Green leader forgetting her figures.

For example, the vacant building credit that the government introduced in December 2014, exempts any housing developer who turns an empty building into private housing from paying to build further affordable units. So even if the developer is making good profits, they do not have to contribute to affordable housing.

Super-rich investors will profit from the change; among the first to do so are the redevelopers of an apartment block in Mayfair that was bought in 2013 by Abu Dhabi’s investment fund.

And what about Iain Duncan Smith’s plans to ‘gift’ recent benefit claimants with council house as a reward for being in work for one year? There are around 1.7 million people on the social housing waiting list. These are all people badly in need of a home. IDS’s proposal not only lets these people down, but it assumes that unemployed people choose to be so, and that all they need is a financial incentive to get back to work – as if the promise of a steady income and not having to use food banks was not enough.

There is also David Cameron’s proposal to scrap housing benefit for school leavers in a misguided attempt to improve the work ethic of young people. Again, this proposal overlooks all the complex economic reasons people are out of work and assumes the unemployed just can’t be bothered. Anger about this policy came even from within the prime minister’s own party – Health Committee chair Sarah Wollaston told the BBC:

“I would not support personally taking housing benefit from the most vulnerable. I would not personally support taking away housing benefit from the very young.”

House building is also at its lowest level since 1924. Since the last election, an average of just 201 social and affordable homes have been built in each Conservative-held local authority, according to research obtained by Shadow Local Government secretary Hilary Benn, compared with 403 in Labour-held councils.

In London the problem is especially bad, despite the capital’s growing population. According to the last census, London needs at least 40,000 new homes every year just to keep up with this growth, yet in 2010/11 less than half of that number were built.

All over the country people are finding it harder than ever for people to pay their rents, and home ownership is a laughable dream for a whole generation. Worse, homelessness charity Shelter reports that the number of homeless children is at a three-year high. So let’s take the heat off the Green leader for a second and start holding the government who have actually caused these problems to account.

Natalie Bennett apologised for her interview which, to be fair, hasn’t actually hurt anybody. The same cannot be said of the Conservatives, or of the policies they have introduced.

Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter

112 Responses to “Forget Natalie Bennett’s interview from hell, here’s the real problem with housing”

1. 

   itdoesntaddup

   February 25, 2015

   Let’s indeed turn the focus on the government that caused home prices to treble (trebles all round); oversaw a doubling of the BTL sector; was the first government since the war to fail to reduce the ratio of population to homes; oversaw a quintupling of the Housing Landlord Benefit budget; failed to prevent the bankruptcy of mortgage banks through lack of sensible regulatory effort – and still has no clue how to tackle the mess it made.

2. 

   littleoddsandpieces

   February 25, 2015

   …and that all they need is a financial incentive to get back to work – as if the promise of a steady income and not having to use food banks was not enough …

   The unemployed are only 3 per cent of the benefit bill. Source Dame Anne Begg, Labour.

   97 per cent of the benefit bill are the working poor, inside of which are half of the over 50s / over 60s, and poor pensioners, only on the state pension, the lowest of all rich nations bar poor Mexico.

   Work does not pay for many far below a living wage or even on the minimum wage.
   Most jobs created since 2008 are working poor / part time / insecure / zero hour contracts now rising more and more.

   If you can vote The Greens, vote them if you are in work or unemployed,
   as this is the Vote or Starve election. All other so-called big parties in the media’s eye,
   will just keep doing the austerity that threatens cut benefits, most of which are in-work.

   If you do not have The Greens candidate in your area, then you can vote as an anti austerity
   MP candidate either of these parties:

   Class War (double dole and pension) – especially unseat Iain Duncan Smith in London
   Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC)
   The Left Unity Party
   Socialist party of Great Britain (Socialist GB)
   Mebyon Kernow of Cornwall

   Because the poor outnumber most other voters in huge numbers of voting areas in England, and could even unseat the sitting Tory MP.

   In Scotland vote SNP – more help for the poor than any other so-called big party.
   In Wales vote Plaid Cymru – offer Living Wage for all.

   Both of these Celt parties will be kingmakers, not Lib Dem – the gone party – in that they will be important for Labour to stop the cuts to welfare, in or out of work and from 18 to infinity.

   See how to gain this coalition at:
   http://www.anastasia-england.me.uk

3. 

   Guest

   February 25, 2015

   Of course you’ll frantically make excuses for Thatcher, as you whine that people were not turned out into the streets. Labour didn’t fix what Thatcher broke, as you oppose shelter for the poor. And let’s remember that your friends wanted less bank regulation.

4. 

   Guest

   February 25, 2015

   Stop? No, you won’t be stopped.

5. 

   greg

   February 25, 2015

   You didn’t answer the question posed by the article title.

   Absurd national and local planning regulations and insane local councils are the big problem with housing.

Comments are closed.