The mayor’s closure of fire stations will cost lives

Since Boris forced through station closures, fire engine response times have risen dramatically.

Fire safety

Since Boris forced through station closures, fire engine response times have risen dramatically

Sometimes politics can seem a bit far removed from everyday life, and at others it is at the forefront of the things which affect us most. Boris Johnson’s decision last year to close ten of the capital’s fire stations and axe 14 fire appliances is quite literally a life changer.

This week we got the first analysis of response times since the mayor forced through the closures. Despite his assurances, the results have been devastating. Response times in 371 London wards have increased – that’s more than half of the capital’s 649 wards.

Overall there are now 214 areas where it takes longer than the six minute target for a fire engine to arrive, and 141 wards also miss the second fire engine arrival target of 8 minutes.

Whilst increases of a minute here or a few seconds there are brushed aside by the Mayor’s supporters, when you’re dealing with fires, seconds save lives. The speed with which fires take hold and spread means any increase in response time can be acutely dangerous.

It’s not just a few areas which have seen increases. Londonwide average response times have increased for both the first and second fire engine responses. It is very fortunate that so far we have not seen an increase in serious incidents as a result.

The worry among fire fighters is that these cuts are just the first step. Only last week the chair of the Fire Authority James Cleverly refused to rule out another round of cuts. Indeed in some respect it has already started.

Since the closures in January a further 13 fire engines have been removed in order to cover potential strikes, further degrading response times. Whilst it is prudent to plan for strike cover there is absolutely no reason why these appliances should be kept out of service outside of strike periods, as is currently happening.

As a result London has lost 27 fire engines in the last year; it is hardly a surprise that response times are up, in some areas by almost three minutes. What reason does the mayor have for keeping fire engines out of service other than as a precursor to further permanent cuts?

All this comes at a time when nationally fire fighters are under siege, being forced to work to sixty or see their pensions slashed. It is clear that the fire service is in dire straits as a result of Boris Johnson and his colleagues in Government.

The first duty of a mayor is to protect the public. Boris Johnson needs to ask himself whether closing ten fire stations and removing 27 fire engines is really the best way to achieve that.

Fiona Twycross is a Labour London Assembly member. Follow her on Twitter

6 Responses to “The mayor’s closure of fire stations will cost lives”

  1. Neil Crossfield

    Let’s not forget that when I joined the brigade in 1986 a large part of the LFB was what we called “A” risk. You would then get the first fire engine there within 4 minutes and two others shortly afterwards. Progress? The real fear is that further cuts and eventual privatisation will destroy the once proud LFB.

  2. John Smith

    Politicians need to be reminded of how rapid a fire develops. A very good example is the televised account of the Bradford city Football stadium fire. three minutes from the first small signs to total involvement and 52 deaths

  3. dan ash

    Please stop referring to Johnson as “Boris”. It just perpetuates the myth that he’s somehow cuddly and different to other politicians.

  4. Thomas

    I bet it’s the fire stations in the poor areas that were cut.

  5. Sparky

    Do you mean in the same way that Ken Livingstone was referred to as Livingstone?

  6. Samantha mcdonald

    Yes i agree with you.

Leave a Reply