Tories vote with BNP to ‘set womens’ rights back 30 years’


Tory MEPs have voted with the BNP in the European Parliament against a resolution supporting womens’ sexual and reproductive health after caving in to pressure from ‘pro-life’ activists.

Tory mepsFour Tory MEPs yesterday voted against a report which called for a rights-based approach to access to sexual and reproductive healthcare that is free from discrimination, despite the fact that even UKIP MEPs backed it.

The Tories were also criticised for the manner in which the debate was conducted. Mary Honeyball MEP, Labour’s European spokesperson on women’s rights, called the behaviour of some Tory MEPs “absolutely disgraceful”, describing scenes of “boorish Tory men shouting and bullying members who are discussing serious issues around women’s right to choose”.

“Today we saw David Cameron’s Tories vote with Nick Griffin and the fascists against the rights of women. Not even UKIP voted with the BNP on this,” she added.

Previously Conservative, UKIP and four Lib Dem MEPs were instrumental in obstructing the progress of the report by referring it back to the committee stage and trying to block MEPs from voting on it.

S&D Euro MP Edite Estrela (Portugal), who drafted the resolution, said after the vote that Conservative MEPs wanted to “set women’s rights back 30 years”.

“I deeply regret the decision taken today. On several occasions, this Parliament has recognised the right for everyone to make their own informed and responsible choices on their sexual and reproductive life,” she said.

“The draft resolution was approved by the women’s committee with a strong majority of 17 votes in favour, 7 abstentions and 7 against. By not respecting the outcome of the vote in parliamentary committee, the conservatives want to set women’s rights back 30 years.”

No wonder that in a recent poll 42 per cent of women said they would vote for Labour, compared with just 29 per cent who would back the Tories

This entry was posted in Good Society and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • S.r. Williams

    Surprise bloody surprise.

  • swatnan

    We need a comments from Jo Swinson and Gloria Perero.

  • swatnan

    We need a comments from Jo Swinson and Gloria Perero.

  • Dan

    Need more detail on the report before condemning the vote.If it’s anything to do with “feminism” then it sounds like it went the right way.

  • JessieXL

    Can’t have women making decisions about their own bodies, can you?

  • Nevermore

    Feminism aims for everyone to be treated equally, and to have the same rights and responsibilities, regardless of gender. Can you explain what’s so wrong with that?

  • Peter Cook

    If Nick Griffin voted it down it was probably best for women he has 3 daughters and a wife.

  • Selohesra

    What about rights for unborn babies – can you explain what’s so wrong with that?

  • Dan

    Very good point

  • Dan

    Good point

  • Dan

    You’d rather the EU make the decisions would you?

  • Hatted

    Unborn babies don’t have any rights. They are not yet human, so they do not qualify for human rights. In those cases, the rights of the woman carrying the bag of cells have the rights, the same way they would if they wanted to remove any other unwanted bits from their body. People keep ascribing emotion to mindless clumps of cells, usually based on religions containing outdated and incorrect information.

  • dave w

    That’s a lie its only interest is demonising men and trying to create an us and them divide, its also against family values and has no real interest in women anymore, its only interest is to have a go at men for every wrong doing in the world in general !!