Osborne’s dash for gas will worsen fuel poverty


 

James Angel is a social policy intern at the new economics foundation (nef)

Alongside the autumn statement yesterday came George Osborne’s ‘gas strategy’, designed, in his words, “to make the best use of the lower cost of gas power”. The reality is the cost of gas is rising, with devastating environmental and social implications.

George-Osborne-Dash-for-GasAs well as spelling disaster for the climate, the problem Osborne is so desperately trying to obscure is the rising cost of gas is, in reality, the main factor driving up energy bills. Ofgem estimates that of the £150 average energy bill increase last year, £100 of this was due to the rising cost of gas. What’s more, experts say the only way is up.

The chancellor claims:

“We don’t want British businesses and families to be left behind as gas prices tumble on the other side of the Atlantic.”

Did he miss the ECC’s recent report that said shale “will not be a ‘cheap’ source of gas and there is unlikely to be a repeat of the US experience”? All of the evidence says that, while the advent of shale gas may have brought down gas prices in the US, this could not happen in the UK. Instead, it is the costs of renewables that are quickly declining.

The social impact of gas on our energy bills is that one in four UK homes are now in fuel poverty.

Using World Health Organization estimates, 7,200 of last year’s 24,000 excess winter deaths were a result of cold homes; deaths from hypothermia have doubled over the past five years.

Millions of people are being forced to choose between heating and eating. Fuel bill debt is spiralling out of control and the NHS is left saddled with a £1.36 billion burden spent on treating the health impacts of cold homes. Osborne’s decision to dash for gas instead of renewables will only exacerbate what is already a national scandal.

The situation is compounded by austerity, ever-worsening inequalities, falling wages and rising food prices (the latter of which is being driven by climate change and so will also be intensified by more gas). The money available to support those in fuel poverty has already been cut by a quarter, while energy efficiency measures for the fuel poor have been slashed by 44%.

Yesterday’s autumn statement announcement of deeper cuts will make the bills bite even harder. Meanwhile, the profit-margins of the Big Six energy companies increased by 700 per cent in a five-month period last year.

Things don’t have to be this way. Choosing renewables over gas would bring down bills, tackle climate change, create jobs and save the economy£20bn a year. What’s more, renewable energy naturally lends itself to decentralisation and democratic community control and, as such, could form the basis of a re-organised society that allows communities to benefit from and have control over their energy.

We’re catching a glimpse of this in the co-operative energy projects emerging in towns and cities across the country, from Brixton to Bristol to Brighton. These projects have emerged alongside a new and diverse social movement against the dash for gas which has seen gas power stations occupied and pensioners demonstrating outside the Treasury in the context of a surge of public support for renewables.

The battle for our energy future has begun.

This article was first published on the nef blog.

See also:

Graph: UK energy consumption by sectorNovember 29th, 2012

Osborne’s ‘dash for gas’ dashes hopes for growthDecember 4th, 2012

“One Planet” Labour: Miliband and Balls a welcome contrast to gas-loving OsborneNovember 27th, 2012

The new dash for gas is utter follyMarch 20th, 2012

Shale gas is not the answer to our energy problems – and here’s whySeptember 15th, 2011

This entry was posted in Sustainable Economy and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • LB

    Cut green subsidies.

    Allow the Greens to purchase Green power if they want to.

    Stop forcing others to pay over the odds.

    Cut all taxes on fuel.

    Ah, you can’t. You’ve got a client state to support, and that means taxes, spending their pensions, leaving them destitute when you can’t pay the pensions they have paid for.

  • Newsbot9

    Tax on fuel? Oh, right, the subsidies.

    And yes, you don’t want people to have their pensions, since you personally refuse to pay them, and will do anything to stop people having pensions.

  • Newsbot9

    Yes, shame you’re on Cameron’s side. Back in reality, wind power is not getting cheaper, and we’re a good decade away from worthwhile PV power in the UK. Moreover, both require gas backing.

    What we need is nuclear power. Not gas. Moreover, you are as usual ignoring the externalities of your moves, the massively inflated power bills which will deprive the poor of power and cost more jobs than you create.

    You keep campaigning for gas, I’ll do otherwise.

  • http://twitter.com/faykellytuncay Repeal the Act!

    Help us send our “Enough is enough” Christmas message to Decc Minister Ed Davey to repeal, suspend or amend the [2008] Climate Change Act to get our fuel and energy bills down and save 3.5 million British children living in poverty from being cold and hungry this Christmas.

    Climate legislation is hurting millions of British children who are our future – by killing their parents jobs, stagnating wages, increased living costs on fuel, energy, public transport, clothes and food.

    A recent report by Save the Children shows that poverty leaves children without a warm coat or new shoes. It means they miss out on experiences that are central to a happy childhood, such as going on a family holiday or having a friend round for tea or having a few gifts at Christmas time.

    Enough is enough! Ed Davey repeal the Climate Change Act now!

    http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/42784

    SIGN HERE AND SHARE ON FACEBOOK AND TWITTER

  • http://www.affinitysutton.com/buy_or_rent_a_home/buy.aspx Kenn Kavagna

    Greener housing is the way forward for ending fuel poverty. This isn’t just about renewable energy but also building energy efficient homes that retain their heat. Rather than cutting down on building affordable housing that are green because they may initially be more expensive we should be increasing the number of green homes. In the long term they are cheaper to run, which will also drops the demand on gas in the UK.

  • YouGov Tracker

  • Touchstone Economic Tracker

  • Best of the web

  • Archive

7ads6x98y