We already pay significantly more for rail travel than anyone else in Europe – 75% more than the next most expensive country
.
Richard Hebditch is Campaigns Director for the Campaign for Better Transport
The urgent need for fairer railway fares has been highly visible across the media this week.
The basis of passenger’s anger is threefold. First, fares are going up three times faster than salaries, continuing a decade-long trend of above inflation rises.
Second, we already pay significantly more for rail travel than anyone else in Europe – 75% more than the next most expensive country for the most common ticket types like season tickets.
Third, it’s unclear where it will end – the government has given a commitment to ending above inflation rises, but has set no date for doing this.
Why do our trains cost so much? The government rightly cites the investments being made in the network which is supposed to produce more reliable services and better stations.
This is pricey– the UK network is at its core still based on the Victorian network which is expensive to maintain let alone improve. The spending is needed to reverse many years of underfunding, but Network Rail is on target to cut the state’s share of spending on rail to 25% by 2014.
Is government’s spending value for public money? Undoubtedly so – on the economy, Network Rail estimates that 1 billion work-related journeys are undertaken on the railways every year. Pricing people off the trains and onto the roads – or out of work altogether – would be economically illiterate.
Rail is often more sustainable than other transport options, too. If public transport is too expensive – ‘a rich man’s toy’ as former transport Secretary Philip Hammond dubbed the railways – then poorer households are either less able to travel or completely reliant on the car, with all the attendant impacts on congestion and social isolation.
Railways make for good towns and cities. Development around railways tends to be higher density and less car dependent. This uses less land, supports existing communities and is the very antithesis of modern car-based sprawl which blights so many towns.
• Will Osborne match his support for motorists with a fair fare for rail users? 15 Aug 2012
• Rail investment irrelevant to those who can no longer afford rising train fares 17 Jul 2012
• Network Rail fat cats to trouser £1.7m in bonuses – as fares skyrocket 11% 3 Jul 2012
Finally, we need a decent rail network if we are to get anywhere near our environmental responsibilities. Because it’s more efficient, a well-used train network produces significantly less carbon emissions than transport based only around roads. As such, rail is part of any serious emissions reduction strategy.
What next? Campaign for Better Transport’s Fair Fares Now campaign is an important focus for commuters’ anger. Before the fare rises kick in at the beginning of January, we will be pushing government to call a halt to RPI plus 3% – as they did last year – and matching the support it showed to road users in postponing the planned rise in road fuel duty.
Government must also make an announcement on when it will enact its commitment to end above inflation increases.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
14 Responses to “What next for rail fares?”
LB
And you’ve left off the tax that people who don’t use the railways are forced to pay for the fat cats who do.
You’ve left off the debt that future generations have to pay. Standard government fraud. Just wait until civil service pension costs go through the roof. Not on the books, so no obligation to pay. That is the standard treasury line about why debts aren’t on the books.
The plan is not to pay out.
Newsbot9
And as usual, you’re determined that ONLY the rich can use the trains.
And even more usually, Blagger, you highlight your refusal to pay. When will you?
rfewf
people that use trains should pay for trains. ie no subsidy
Newsbot9
i.e. Trains for the rich.
Right. I completely disagree, again, because I think a healthy economy is a good thing. Your wealth’s offshore, so you don’t have a stake in this either.
mjg
you have no idea where I live you idiot.
now shouldn’t you be revising for your GCSEs?