Regional pay is “Tory code” for slashing pay of the poorest NHS workers


E-mail-sign-up Donate

 

.

The Welsh government has launched a strong attack on Westminster’s plans for variable pay in the public sector following the news over the weekend that UK health secretary Andrew Lansley is supporting the Treasury’s push for regional pay in the health service, a measure that would have an impact on nurses, midwives, hospital porters, cleaners and paramedics.

George-Osborne-Andrew-LansleyIn announcing the Scottish and Welsh governments have submitted a joint letter to the NHS Pay Review Body making crystal clear it will not be provided with a remit to consider regional health service pay in Scotland and Wales, Welsh health minister Lesley Griffiths outlined the anger of the Assembly government.

In no uncertain terms, she wrote:

“Our stance on introducing regional pay is clear – we do not support it. We view it as Tory code for cutting the pay of NHS workers in Wales.”

Peter Meredith-Smith, associate director of the Royal College of Nursing in Wales, added:

“We would see regional pay as a negative step for health services and nurses in Wales – it’s ideologically-driven and supports market thinking, creating competition between organisations whether across the border or within Wales.

“We have always had a very cohesive and rational approach to workforce planning in Wales but introducing a market philosophy means that will go to the wall.

“There’s a real risk of drift of staff to areas which are more affluent and this approach would drive down pay in certain areas – I suspect Wales would suffer badly.”

 


See also:

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland round on Osborne over regional pay plans 31 Mar 2012

Poll: Regional public sector pay differentiation unfair and will harm economy 30 Mar 2012

The 12 practical problems of localising public sector pay 25 Jan 2012


 

Meanwhile, as the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander yesterday called on Whitehall departments to make an additional £16 billion of savings, in Scotland, Labour has accused the SNP of breaching a manifesto commitment to protect the NHS budget.

In a paper (pdf) produced for Holyrood’s health and sport committee, Dr Andrew Walker, a health economist at Glasgow University, revealed the country’s 22 NHS boards are planning to save a total of £256.3 million in 2012-13. The figures come despite the SNP’s manifesto pledge (page 3, pdf) at the 2011 elections “to protect the NHS budget in Scotland”.

Accusing the SNP of downright “betrayal”, shadow cabinet secretary for health, Labour’s Jackie Baillie, declared:

“The cold, hard reality is that across Scotland, health boards are being forced to make multimillion-pound cuts because of SNP budget decisions.

“The SNP government at Holyrood appear increasingly out of touch with the pain they are inflicting on our health services locally. Under the SNP, over 4,500 NHS staff have lost their jobs, including 2,000 nurses.

“It is grossly unfair that it is hard-working frontline NHS staff that are being forced to bear the brunt of the SNP’s cuts. It is a betrayal of all those who put their trust in the SNP, expecting them to keep their promise to protect the health service and frontline workers.”

Dismissing the finds of the report, a spokesman for the Scottish government responded:

“This government is committed to protecting health spending and it is wrong to suggest otherwise. The health resource budget is protected – we will see a record £11.6 billion resource funding for health in Scotland in 2014-15, that’s £826 million more than in 2011-12.

“These figures are absolutely not cuts to the health budget – boards are looking to make some services more efficient and any savings will be reinvested in local frontline care. It’s right that boards make sure the taxpayer gets the best possible value for money.”

 


Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

This entry was posted in Public Services for All and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Pingback: Alice in Blunderland()

  • Pingback: Shamik Das()

  • http://twitter.com/nechildpoverty NE CP Commission

    Hi, an excellent post. Neil Foster from the Nortern TUC provided us with a guest post on this and whilst it has a particular focus on the impact regional pay would have on the North East, some of your readers might be interested in reading it here: http://northeastchildpoverty.wordpress.com/2012/04/18/northern-tuc-guest-post-regional-pay-risks-a-spiral-of-decline/

  • Anonymous

    Whilst we are one the subject. Ed wants regional benefit levels.

    What changes is he proposing for the level in benefits in Bradford? (Not a labour seat anymore, so there is no electoral disadvantage in tell us). Will benefits rise or fall under his plan?

    If regional ‘pay’ is correct for benefits, why not for other parts of public spending?

  • Pingback: Noxi()

  • Pingback: neil cooksley()

  • Anonymous

    It’s not correct for issues outside housing. But then again, a centralist isn’t going to recognise this. The left and Labour don’t share much at all these days.

  • Pingback: Andrew Crory()

  • Anonymous

    Labour party policy. Out of the mouth of Ed Milliband. However, he’s gone very quite on it, keeping it a secret from the voters.

    Why isn’t it correct for issues outside housing? After all there is now a cap on housing.

    If you live in an area where lots of things are cheap, then why should poor working people fund you?

  • Anonymous

    Yes, and once more I’m a left winger, not a Labourite. It shows how massively misguided Labour is, that they’re willing to ensure that poorer people in other regions will be shafted even harder on things like basic clothes.

    And the housing cap is completely off-base, and only a minor part of your enthusiastically supported program of social cleansing. One Labour prove their non-left credentials by endorsing.

    And “things are cheap”. I see. Except, of course, that they’re generally not – the vast majority of goods are not priced regionally. And well, that’s a good reason to depress the economy of poorer areas, never mind that without money to spend, they’ll spiral downwards. Never mind that before the slash and burn, the areas private economies in those areas were recovering.

    CAN’T BE ALLOWED! No seed to allow recovery can go without being smashed! People living in poorer areas can’t be thinking about those manufactured goods now!

    Gotta push the poor into the slums you love so much.

  • Pingback: cathredfern()

  • Pingback: BevR()

  • Pingback: Foxy52()

  • Pingback: Grant Buttars()

  • Pingback: Jon (Bambi) Page()

  • JC

    So what is the minimum hourly rate for NHS workers, and how does it compare for example with the going rate in Cornwall?

  • Pingback: Laura()

  • Pingback: SHA Scotland()

  • Pingback: SocialistProductions()

  • Pingback: Andreas Baader()

  • Pingback: W&T Labour()

  • Pingback: maureen keane()

  • Pingback: Poll: Voters caution against risky regional pay | Left Foot Forward()

  • Pingback: The NHS crisis: A spotter’s guide | Left Foot Forward()