New report warns legal aid cuts will pile pressure on MPs’ surgeries

Will Horwitz reports that MPs’ surgeries will see a dramatic surge in people seeking legal help after the legal aid cuts are introduced in April 2013.

Justice denied is justice denied, and under this government that’s exactly what will happen

E-mail-sign-up Donate



A new report (pdf) launched in Parliament today suggests MPs’ surgeries will see a dramatic surge in people seeking legal help after the legal aid cuts are introduced in April 2013, as local advice agencies and legal aid lawyers close or scale back and MPs become the ‘advisor of last resort’ for increasing numbers of constituents.

Statue-of-Justice-Old-BaileyThe report, conducted by Young Legal Aid Lawyers and based on interviews with MPs, their caseworkers and constituents, shows how MPs already devote considerable time and money to helping constituents resolve legal problems, and often refer people on to local advice agencies and legal aid solicitors.

The legal aid bill – currently at Report Stage in the House of Lords, as reported on Left Foot Forward last week – will see substantial areas of law cut from the scope of legal aid.

These include help with welfare benefits, debt, employment and immigration, all of which feature heavily amongst the issues MPs help with at present. About 650,000 people will lose access to legal aid under government’s proposals.

The problem will be exacerbated by a lack of support for MPs themselves – at present the research shows constituency offices will often refer clients on to local advice agencies or legal aid solicitors. Without this option, they will be forced to deal with more complex issues themselves.

This will be difficult without considerably increased staff expertise, and in some areas of law is actually illegal.


See also:

Lib Dem conference gives Clegg a get out of jail free card on the legal aid cuts 12 Mar 2012

Spotlight shone on legal aid cuts as Clarke urged to think again 9 Mar 2012

Khan: Clarke must listen to the Lords and save legal aid for the most vulnerable in society 9 Mar 2012

Tory and Crossbench peers lead the revolt against Clarke’s legal aid cuts 9 Mar 2012

The financial and personal cost of the legal aid cuts laid bare 7 Mar 2012


Ultimately the impact will be felt by constituents themselves, since it is unlikely MP surgeries will be able to meet the demand or provide the level of expert help many require, and charities have made it clear they will not be able to pick up the slack.

Most recently Citizens Advice announced legal aid cuts will decimate specialist advice in bureaux, and a fifth of advice centres surveyed by campaign group Justice for All said they were at risk of closure next year.

The debate resumes today with an amendment led by Baroness Grey-Thompson which would ensure advice continues to be provided face-to-face as well as over the phone. If it is unsuccessful, there is even more chance MPs will be left as the only source of face-to-face advice, even on areas of law that remain within legal aid.

This report highlights, yet again, the recklessness of the legal aid cuts. Repeated studies have shown that they will not save money, and will leave vulnerable people with nowhere to turn for help on vital and complex issues.

Last week a group of peers from all sides of the House, led by Liberal Democrat Baroness Doocey, won an amendment to keep welfare benefit appeals and reviews within the scope of legal aid.

As Lord Newton, Conservative former social security secretary, pointed out, advice on benefits is used predominantly by disabled people, and significantly improves the accuracy of decision making at tribunal. It also saves money (Citizens Advice estimate £8.80 for every £1 spent) and will be vital during significant reforms to the benefits system.

Perhaps all this, on top of the prospect of hundreds of constituents queuing up outside their weekly surgery, will be enough to convince MPs to take another serious look at these reforms and accept the amendments won in the Lords.


Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

  • Pingback: Pulp Ark()

  • Pingback: leftlinks()

  • Anonymous

    So what?

    It just means the poor get treated the same way as the middle class.

    Meanwhile the lawyers get a pay cut.

    The real problem is the law.

    It’s too expensive. There are too many laws. It’s a closed shop. Those in the closed shop are very wealthy as a result. So they don’t want competition that will drive down prices.

    Legal aid is just a symptom.

    The cuts are just a symptom of the massive government debts.

    So the Tories will get their small spending state, and you will get massive rates of taxation. Legacy of borrow and burn.

  • Pingback: Patron Press - #P2()

  • Pingback: Tristram Wyatt()

  • Newsbot9

    Oh right, so the protections poor people have need slashing.
    And you’ll hike the tax rates on the poor to pay for the additional costs this causes.

    Typical right-wing thinking. Along with the voodoo economics, your love of recessions simply because you can short-sell is disgusting.

  • Pingback: Political Planet()

  • Pingback: Will Horwitz()

  • Pingback: JusticeForAll()

  • Pingback: Nearly Legal()

  • Will

    I agree the law in many areas is too complex, and government should look at this too (it’s a point several peers have made during the recent debates). Even more importantly for areas of law like housing, or welfare benefits, decision making (particularly within the DWP) must improve, because poor initial decision making is what drives much legal aid in these areas. If either (or both) happened then the legal aid bill would naturally fall, and no-one would complain. The problem is when it’s cut without sorting out any of the underlying problems, which just means people are left with nowhere to go, and their problems escalate.

  • Pingback: Dr Marc Bush()

  • Pingback: Ruth Hayes()

  • Pingback: Vanessa()

  • Pingback: The reality of life as one of Ken Clarke’s ‘fat cat legal aid lawyers’ | Left Foot Forward()