Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets

Friends of the Earth today described the government’s omission of shipping from its climate targets as “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”.

Friends of the Earth today described the UK government’s omission of shipping emissions in its climate targets as “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”.

FoE were responding to the Committee on Climate Change’s Review of UK Shipping Emissions, published this morning, which warns the UK’s share of international shipping could account for up to 11 per cent of British emissions by 2050.

The CCC, like FoE, says shipping emissions should be included in the UK’s 2050 climate targets.

It sets out options for the inclusion of shipping in UK carbon budgets – a cap on the total quantity of greenhouse gas emissions that can be emitted over a five year period.

Under the Climate Change Act the UK has to cut its emissions by 80% (of 1990 levels) by 2050 – yet this target doesn’t include the UK’s share of emissions from international shipping or aviation.

Friends of the Earth’s transport campaigner Richard Dyer said:

“Leaving out the UK’s share of international shipping from our climate targets would be like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky. Ignoring the growing climate impact of shipping would be a titanic mistake which could sink our ability to develop a safe and prosperous future.

“The international community must also take urgent action to ensure the shipping industry plays its part in a low-carbon transport system.”

In 2007, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) estimated carbon dioxide emissions from shipping – then estimated at at 4-5% of the global total – could rise by up to 72% by 2020 if no action gets taken.

At the time, the Guardian reported:

Aviation carbon dioxide emissions, estimated to be about 2% of the global total, have been at the forefront of the climate change debate because of the sharp increase in cheap flights, whereas shipping emissions have risen nearly as fast in the past 20 years but have been ignored by governments and environmental groups.

Shipping is responsible for transporting 90% of world trade which has doubled in 25 years…

Britain downplays the problem, saying that ships in UK waters emit less than two million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year. But no record is kept of the fuel used and most ships take on fuel outside Britain. Although the industry maintains that ships are more efficient at transferring freight than air, it admits improvements can be made.

More recently, in 2009, a study found one giant container ship could emit “the same amount of cancer and asthma-causing chemicals as 50m cars”, concluding the health risks of shipping pollution had been “underestimated”.

The Guardian reported the findings:

Britain and other European governments have been accused of underestimating the health risks from shipping pollution following research which shows that one giant container ship can emit almost the same amount of cancer and asthma-causing chemicals as 50m cars.

Confidential data from maritime industry insiders based on engine size and the quality of fuel typically used by ships and cars shows that just 15 of the world’s biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world’s 760m cars. Low-grade ship bunker fuel (or fuel oil) has up to 2,000 times the sulphur content of diesel fuel used in US and European automobiles.

Finally, some stats to ram home the scale of shipping pollution, which Friends of the Earth and the Committee on Climate Change both say should be included in the government’s emissions targets:

• There are 90,000 ocean-going cargo ships;

Shipping is responsible for 18-30% of all the world’s nitrogen oxide (NOx) pollution and 9% of the global sulphur oxide (SOx) pollution;

• One large ship can generate about 5,000 tonnes of sulphur oxide (SOx) pollution in a year;

Seventy per cent of all ship emissions are within 400km of land;

• Eighty five per cent of all ship pollution is in the northern hemisphere.

See also:

If Osborne gives up the lead on climate change, he can kiss goodbye to a recoveryAndrew Pendleton, October 10th 2011

Government continues not being greenest everAlex Hern, October 3rd 2011

Labour must speak out against discriminatory pay for foreign seafarersRuwan Subasinghe, December 5th 2010

Copenhagen – What about ships and planes?Joss Garman, November 10th 2009

World leaders still a long way off 2020 emissions targetsJoss Garman, September 9th 2009

31 Responses to “Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets”

  1. SERA

    RT @leftfootfwd: Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets: http://t.co/f3iJbAgx by @ShamikDas

  2. James Leppard

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets: http://t.co/AphtRcMd by @ShamikDas

  3. Political Planet

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets: Friends of the Earth today descr… http://t.co/ifZMBmAu

  4. RJ

    RT @leftfootfwd: Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets: http://t.co/f3iJbAgx by @ShamikDas

  5. CurateNews

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets: http://t.co/AphtRcMd by @ShamikDas

  6. darkbluebloke

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets: http://t.co/AphtRcMd by @ShamikDas

  7. Green Party LGBT

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets: http://t.co/AphtRcMd by @ShamikDas

  8. carbon meme

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets via @leftfootfwd http://t.co/AtPNobgA

  9. Alan Cowan

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets | Left Foot Forward http://t.co/eZmeLlrn

  10. 16hebrews_

    Anger at government's failure to include shipping emissions in … http://t.co/Se9oyaWA

  11. David Gillon

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  12. andrew tobert

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  13. Legal Aware

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  14. Alex Hern

    @ClimateRush Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/5QrIH1Ei

  15. Sarah Shoraka

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  16. Porsupah

    "Just 15 of the world’s biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world’s 760m cars" http://t.co/BHUkx1jm (h/t @leftfootfwd)

  17. Alex Hern

    AHAHA we should all just die now "15 of the world’s biggest ships emit as much pollution as all the world’s 760m cars." http://t.co/5QrIH1Ei

  18. Rav Strom

    "Just 15 of the world’s biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world’s 760m cars" http://t.co/BHUkx1jm (h/t @leftfootfwd)

  19. Paul Crowley

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  20. Ernie

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  21. OccupySL

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  22. Catherine Brunton

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  23. Neutron Decay

    For the morning crowd: Not counting shipping in climate targets “like an alcoholic giving up all booze except whisky”. http://t.co/94Qjtw80

  24. diane gilpin

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets http://t.co/ohw1i9Cs

  25. Alice

    MT@alexhern we shd all jst di now"15 of the wrld’s biggest ships emit as much pollution as all th world’s 760m cars." http://t.co/iXyftby8

  26. Sean O'Hare

    Oh for heaven’s sake! When will it get through to the Guardian, and the left in general, that the CAGW scam is a busted flush? It’s over and the warmists have lost!

  27. Barry Johnston

    RT @leftfootfwd: Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets: http://t.co/f3iJbAgx by @ShamikDas

  28. Oxfam South West

    Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets http://t.co/UBwpIHhN

  29. Dave Coleman

    Hmmm, some very powerful stats here. I’d add a much loved Winston Churchill quote : ‘It is no use saying, “We are doing our best.” You have got to succeed in doing what is necessary.’

    re: Comment 1.
    Sean : the overwhelming evidence (including that only last week from the scientists commissioned by the Climate Change denial critics that attempted University of East Anglia smear), has long since convinced the decision makers and the majority of the public of the sense and urgency of rapid action on climate change. The Guardian’s coverage is simply reflecting that reality.

  30. Look Left – G20 fails to calm the storm as eurozone crisis grows | Left Foot Forward

    […] Committee on Climate Change Review of UK Shipping Emissions (pdf), which yesterday warned the UK’s share of international shipping could account for up to 11 per cent of British emissions […]

  31. Durban’s a letdown, Canada’s a dropout, and Russia’s leaking methane | Left Foot Forward

    […] Anger at government’s failure to include shipping emissions in climate targets – Shamik Das, November 3rd […]

Leave a Reply