With the coalition’s efforts to win back female voters in the news, today’s new employment stats couldn’t have come at a worse time, writes James Plunkett.
James Plunkett is the secretary to the Resolution Foundation’s Commission on Living Standards
With the coalition’s efforts to win back female voters in the news today, this morning’s new employment stats (pdf) couldn’t have come at a worse time.
The figures on women’s employment are terrible.
First, underemployment – an area of particular importance to women in the jobs market – has reached historic highs:
• The number of people working part-time because they can’t find full-time work is up 70,000 quarter-on-quarter to 1.28 million, the highest figure since records began in 1992.
And on headline employment and claimant rates among women, the figures are also deeply worrying:
• The number of unemployed women is up 41,000 to 1.06m, the highest figure since April 1988;
• The number of women claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance is up 8,100 to 519,200, the highest figure since January 1996.
With the stats looking so gloomy, it’s encouraging to see the coalition at least waking up to the critical challenge of women’s living standards – as Resolution Foundation chief executive Gavin Kelly wrote in the New Statesman yesterday, and as the Guardian reports today.
And it’s also good to see others on the right – in particular those over on Conservative Home – are starting to talk seriously about the need for action.
We shouldn’t, of course, understate the amount of new thinking still needed from the government. (When a ‘Number 10 women’s employment summit’ makes the list of Downing Street policy solutions, you know ideas are in short supply.)
But let’s hope at least that all this renewed attention makes all three political parties raise their game. n the coming months at the Resolution Foundation we’ll be publishing new work revealing just how important women’s work will be to living standards in the years ahead, and we’ll be looking more specifically at the kinds of reform that will be needed; this isn’t going to be solved overnight.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
29 Responses to “New figures show women’s employment prospects the worst for decades”
Kim Blake
New figures show women’s employment prospects the worst for decades: http://t.co/NNm7RuJ by @ResFoundation’s @JamesTPlunkett
Carl Lygo
New figures show women’s employment prospects the worst for decades: http://t.co/NNm7RuJ by @ResFoundation’s @JamesTPlunkett
Charlotte Hale
New figures show women’s employment prospects the worst for decades: http://t.co/NNm7RuJ by @ResFoundation’s @JamesTPlunkett
CAROLE JONES
New figures show women’s employment prospects the worst for decades: http://t.co/NNm7RuJ by @ResFoundation’s @JamesTPlunkett
Political Planet
New figures show women’s employment prospects the worst for decades: With the coalition’s efforts to win back fe… http://t.co/AmDSoJH