Cameron, Clarke, Dorries, Willetts… The Tories keep screwing up on gender equality

Why is it that Conservatives have such a problem with gender equality and women's issues? The last two months alone have featured a litany of misteps by Tories.

How many times yah? 1,2,3,4 times in recent weeks the Tories have screwed up on women

Now the dust has settled on Ken Clarke’s 36 hours in ministerial purgatory – in constant political pain, but not understanding the cause or the cure – a question arises: Why is it that Conservatives have such a problem with gender equality and women’s issues in general?

The last two months alone have featured a litany of misteps by Tories:

1) David Willetts: “Feminism trumps egalitarianism

One may think that declining social mobility in the United Kingdom since the early 1980s may be down to governments and/or structural changes in the economy and society. After all, many Conservatives herald Margaret Thatcher as the woman who changed Britain for ever and irrevocably – the foremost political and cultural figure of our age.

But no. according to Willetts, 18 years of Conservative government, and 11 years of New Labour that accepted the Thatcherite settlement weren’t the cause – it was those pesky feminists.

There is an academic debate here – and Declan Gaffney’s analyis on Left Foot Forward showed, crudely put, that women’s entry into the workforce has a racheting effect. Those countries that are fairly equal become more equal, and those countries which are fairly unequal become more unequal.

But Willetts’s comments were dutifully reported in the right-wing press as blaming the problems of the male working-class at the hands of women and more particularly feminists.

The UK media uses quite a bit of newsprint making women feel guilty for going to work, and Willetts gave them even more ammunition.

2) David Cameron: ‘Calm down dear’

Yes, ‘calm down dear’ is a fairly tiresome catchphrase from an advert on TV. But it is also incredibly patronising. What Cameron didn’t appreciate when he tried to belittle Angela Eagle at Prime Minister’s Questions is how thousands of women are patronised regularly at their workplace and in wider life.

It betrayed a blind spot on the reality of other people’s lives. According to a recent Ipsos-Mori poll (pdf) around two-fifth of women have experienced sexist behavior, including “being whistled at, having sexist comments directed towards you, being touched innappropriately or being discriminated because of your gender”.

3) Nadine Dorries: “Girls – just say no”

Then we have Nadine Dorries’s ten-minute rule bill that calls upon sex education teachers to tell girls aged 13 to 16 that they should say no to sex.

The exact text says:

“That leave be given to bring in a Bill to require schools to provide certain additional sex education to girls aged between 13 and 16; to provide that such education must include information and advice on the benefits of abstinence from sexual activity; and for connected purposes.”

The bill may be accused of ignorance – advising teenagers that they should remain abstinent until they feel emotionally ready for sex is already part of good sex education practice. But worse, there is no part of the bill that instructs teachers to reach boys to say no, or to not pressurise girls into sex. The implication being that when it comes to unwanted pregnancies, its the girls who are soley to blame, and boys are responsibility-free.

This is before we get to Dorries’ assertion that if more girls said no, this would lead to less sexual abuse. Sixty-seven MPs in total voted for the bill – 62 Conservaties, two Labour, two Democratic Unionist and one Liberal Democrat.

4) Ken Clarke: “Classic rape”

What Ken Clarke said and didn’t say has been subject to more analysis than the average Shakespearean speech in the last week. However, the two main charges seem to be that he spoke about it in too light a tone, and that rape where the victim and perpetrator knew each other, or which followed a date, would be a mitigating factor.

After decades of campaigners trying to push for a cultural change in society to etablish date rape as serious as stranger rape, it appeared as if the justice secretary didn’t consider it – in his words – ‘classic rape’.

In the Tories’ defence, the 2010 intake did start to address the gender inbalance among their ranks with plenty of talented examples. However, there is a wider concern that the Government cuts will affect women disproprotionatelly. So much so that cross-party support for a select committee dedicated to women’s issues seems to be growing.

Although each of the episodes can be explained away by giving the benefit of the doubt, a simpler reading would be that David Cameron’s ‘detoxification’ project – so successful on issues like race, sexuality and the environment – took a pass on gender issues.

  • Pingback: Carmen()

  • Pingback: Elly M()

  • Pingback: Marta Owczarek()

  • Pingback: Michael Thompson()

  • Pingback: Virginia Moffatt()

  • Pingback: Dusty()

  • Pingback: Stuart Smith()

  • Ed’s Talking Balls

    Daniel Elton,

    Calm down, dear.

  • Pingback: Emily Davis()

  • Pingback: Quarries & Corridors()

  • Pingback: Patricia Jane Mowat()

  • Jennie Kermode

    Don’t forget former MSP Bill Aitken and his comments on a particular Glasgow rape; or the Payam Tamiz, the councillor and PPC removed for calling women ‘sluts’ in his blog. And then, of course, there was Rogar Helmer MEP with his comments on rape today. The COnservatives have an endemic problem on these issues which they need to tackle with training at a local party level, not just sticking-plaster apologies and excuses after problems occur.

  • Tories Hate Women

    Tories hate women, and here is the evidence: twice as many women work in the public sector as men, therefore the cuts to community services will affect more women. It has an extra affect against women as women will be losing jobs and services and in many cases both.

    The question is of course, why do the Tories hate women? They clearly feel superior to women but that does not justify their hatred. Perhaps they harbour a hatred not just for women per se but for anybody they believe is below their class.

    And so their thinking must follow, as Ken Clarke demonstrated, they believe that it does not really matter if someone who is not of their class is raped, or mugged or murdered as that person is not worth as much as people of their higher caste are.

    In short, they think they are better than us. And yet we pay their wages. It is the same old Tory thinking, it just doesn’t make any sense at all. The Tories are like vampires who take delight in taking advantage of the vulnerable and those who cannot defend themselves.

    They are vultures and have not changed at all. Indeed, with the women haters David Cameron and George Osborne in charge the Tories are going backwards.

  • Pingback: Identity, Gender, and the seach for a hammer Pt. 1 and 2. | universe and everything()

  • Pingback: Jen Smith()

  • Pingback: Shelly Asquith()

  • Pingback: Jade Constable()

  • Pingback: sianberry()

  • Pingback: Rob Clarke()

  • Shelly

    I was going to tell you to add Frank Field to that list after his comments yesterday, then I remembered…

  • Pingback: Hali()

  • Pingback: Joshua Goodman()

  • Mr. Sensible

    Couldn’t agree more Daniel.

    Given all that, is it not therefore correct to say that it is not just the Liberal Democrats who need to assert themselves more within the Coalition, but also the equalities office?

  • Pingback: Daniel Pitt()

  • Pingback: Bennett Mills()

  • Pingback: Where are all the women? | Left Foot Forward()

  • Pingback: Interconnect Network()

  • Tim

    I think it may be worth noticing that Nadine Dorries appears to be a woman. Perhaps she’s doing it to be ironic.

  • Pingback: Huhne attacks "Tea Party Tories" – who on Earth does he mean?! | Left Foot Forward()

  • Pingback: Two weeks after ‘fixing’ it, Cameron creates a new “women problem” | Left Foot Forward()

  • Pingback: The lack of women in Westminster has gone on for too long | Left Foot Forward()

  • Pingback: malcolm()