Jeremy Clarkson: A ‘birther’ born yesterday


Former regressive of the week, Jeremy Clarkson, has spent far too much of his life around petrol fumes. His nutty gaze has risen north from Mexico to the incumbent of the oval office, deciding, as any cutting edge journalist might, now is the time to investigate the circumstances of Barack Obama’s birth.

Jeremy-Clarkson-scummy-manFollowing the release of Obama’s full birth certificate last Wednesday, Clarkson wrote (not available online – see here and here for print jpegs) in his Sun column this weekend:

“He (Obama) has not, however, given a reason for refusing to reveal it earlier. Maybe it’s because the ink wasn’t dry.”

President Obama has no doubt learnt by now that conspiracy theories don’t die, they multiply. So just as no amount of evidence will be enough to convince some people that Osama Bin Laden was killed by US forces, no evidence at all is enough to convince some people that Barack Obama was born outside America.

The insult added to this injury to the collective intelligence is that some of these people are not wild eyed hate-preachers or banjo-playing members of a depleted gene pool in the rocky mountains; some of these people, like Clarkson, are rich “celebrities” who, not content with TV, demand an audience in print or a public office with which to humiliate themselves.

In America this role normally falls to Saran Palin, but recently Donald Trump has bravely stepped into the breach.

One could always use logic, rationality, DNA and documented evidence but it would be of little use. You can’t use evidence to refute what someone believes without any evidence, or despite the evidence. Obama has the right tactic, humour is usually the best strategy:

So to follow Clarkson’s logic: you are not presumed innocent until proven guilty. In fact, you might well be guilty as soon as someone makes an accusation, and of course any accusation, no matter how unreasonable, must be answered.

So we would like to pose a few similarly challenging questions to Clarkson himself; we do of course expect prompt answers with proof, to allay any suspicions:

1. Are you an alien and/or shape shifting lizard?

2. Were you behind the grassy knoll?

3. Have you ever been to Whitechapel and if so can you account for your movements around the second half of the 19th century?

Most importantly of all, why haven’t you left yet?

This entry was posted in Media Integrity and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Pingback: Steve Graves

  • Pingback: Andrew

  • Pingback: Steven Nash

  • Pingback: Jean Slater

  • Pingback: Hitchin England

  • Pingback: Jamie Graham

  • Pingback: Joel Heason

  • Pingback: Mark Everden

  • Pingback: Stewart Lochhead

  • Pingback: Simon Cornwell

  • Mister Jabberwock

    LFF suffers sense of humour bypass.(But it is quite funny for the rest of us to watch)

  • Pingback: P J Fitzpatrick

  • Pingback: RCT UNISON

  • Mathew

    Mister Jabberwock

    Really? You find Clarkson funny?

    How?

  • Mr. Sensible

    I certainly don’t find him funny!

    Well if the American right are trying to keep this one going that tells you everything…

  • Anon E Mouse

    Matthew & Mr.Sensible – You probably didn’t find Mr Cameron’s “Calm down dear” at PMQ’s last week funny either.

    But it was. And so’s Clarkson.

    You don’t like him because he ridicules Lord Mandelson and Lord Prescott at every opportunity and he is immensely popular – Top Gear is the biggest selling export the BBC has.

    For some reason Labour activists seems intent on destroying any future chance at election victory by these types of remarks against the Sun newspaper and anything else that is supported by the masses. That was why Gordon Brown loved The Daily Mail – he got it. Why don’t you?

  • Pingback: Jeremy Clarkson: A ?birther? born yesterday | Pan Heads and Dead Heads Rock On

  • Pingback: Erhan Soydan

  • Pingback: Lauren G

  • Pingback: Kayleigh Anne

  • Pingback: Silvia Giovannoni

  • Lundgrensonianicole

    To Provide the worst profile of a working class hero is a sin. To lie about a representative from Top Gear might be punishable by the production agency. To submit a worst possible picture of someone who is truly an activist, or leftist on this editorial. Then,to lie about him without an facts or evidence shows that a journalist knows nothing editorial laws,or about Jeremy Clarkson. This agency may pursue you based on innacurate “hate mail” in the defense of the working class hero. There are laws of journalism, even against slandering based on false facts that are not true. be careful. To be an editor,based on these premises;you may be filed in law suit or lose your business.

  • YouGov Tracker

  • Touchstone Economic Tracker

  • Best of the web

  • Archive

7ads6x98y