Under the microscope: Cameron’s cancer drug anecdote

In the leaders' debate, David Cameron used an anecdote to highlight his cancer drug policy. But his policy would push up drug prices and reduce value for money.

The cancer drug, Sunitinib (marketed as Sutent), is at the centre of a political row

The Conservatives are very keen for the public to believe that billions of pounds can be saved from budgets such as the NHS by eliminating waste. But some of their more populist health policies run counter to this plan.

In the recent leaders’ debate, David Cameron used an anecdote to highlight his policy:

“I have a man in my constituency called Clive Stone who had kidney cancer who came to see me with seven others. Tragically, two of them have died because they couldn’t get the drug Sutent that they wanted, that was on the market, that people knew was a good drug. That’s a scandal in our country today.”

Setting aside the fact that Sutent does not save lives it prolongs them by a handful of pain free and thus valuable months there are a number of problems here.

First, Sutent has been approved by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) for renal cell carcinoma (kidney cancer) since March 2009. NICE has been criticized for being slow to approve new cancer drugs but they have been speeding up the process with an aim to approve within four months. Contrary to many mendacious reports NICE has approved most of the cancer drugs where it has received an application.

Second, there is the question of whether limited money spent on cancer drugs might be better spent elsewhere – on prevention, screening, or retaining staff. NICE bases its judgement on the notion of QALYs (quality adjusted life years) a metric that tries to capture both the quantity and quality of life for each pound spent. Typically NICE approves treatments that cost £20,000 to £30,000 per QALY. However on occasion and especially in the case of cancer patients this figure is exceeded. Sutent was approved based on a QALY estimate of £54,366. It is hard to argue that cancer patients have been hard done by – at least compared to other NHS patients.

Finally, however, this QALY figure does not tell the whole story about Sutent. The initial estimate of QALY cost was actually £71,462. Undoubtedly realising that Sutent would never be approved at this cost, the manufacturers agreed to make the first-cycle of drug treatment free to the NHS – bringing the cost down to the lower QALY figure (£54,366). This is not a lone example. For instance, the manufacturers of glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis have agreed to reimburse the NHS costs should the treatment prove less cost effective than expected, while the NHS only pays the cost of bortezomib, a treatment for multiple myeloma when patients respond favorably to the drug. Across the board NICE serves to push down the cost to the NHS of expensive drugs. Andrew Dillon, NICE chief executive, said:

“when it appears that the institute cannot support coverage of a treatment given its current price, “we encourage companies to think about what they might do [to make their product cost-effective]… We push the envelope just as much as we possibly can.”

The Conservatives have promised that they will fund the cost of new cancer drugs using £200 million saved from higher National Insurance costs (while perversely discounting the loss of revenues raised by higher NI). However, by undermining NICE and evidence-based medicine in favour of simplistic populism they are likely to find that the cost of these drugs will be far more than they think. Drug companies will not be so generous in future if the Conservatives write them a blank cheque.

UPDATE 11.16:

A crucial part of Cameron’s quite was missing but has now been added: “That’s a scandal in our country today.”

18 Responses to “Under the microscope: Cameron’s cancer drug anecdote”

  1. Will Straw

    Another anecdote bites the dust. Cam gets it wrong on cancer drug Sutent http://bit.ly/bRb578 (via @leftfootfwd) @BenGoldacre

  2. Matthew Draycott

    RT @leftfootfwd: Under the microscope: Cameron's cancer drug anecdote http://bit.ly/bRb578

  3. Malarky67

    I've written a short opinion article on the Tory cancer drug policy for a popular 'left leaning blog': http://bit.ly/bRb578

  4. Nick Warren

    RT @EvidenceMatters: Piece by @Malarky67 assesses Cameron's cancer drug anecdote & finds it lacking: http://bit.ly/bRb578 #leadershipdebate

  5. Gareth Winchester

    RT @EvidenceMatters: Nice piece by @Malarky67 assesses Cameron's cancer drug anecdote & finds it lacking: http://bit.ly/bRb578 #leadershipdebate

  6. Andy Sutherland

    RT @wdjstraw Another anecdote bites the dust. Cam gets it wrong on cancer drug Sutent http://bit.ly/bRb578 (via @leftfootfwd) @BenGoldacre

  7. Evidence Matters

    Nice piece by @Malarky67 assesses Cameron's cancer drug anecdote & finds it lacking: http://bit.ly/bRb578 #leadershipdebate

  8. topsy_top20k

    Under the microscope: Cameron's cancer drug anecdote http://bit.ly/bRb578

  9. Jim Henderson

    Great blog post from my nephew on David Cameron's cancer anecdote http://tinyurl.com/y7gxcrw #leadershipdebate

  10. Vikash Kumar

    CancerHelpForYou.com Under the microscope: Cameron's cancer drug anecdote | Left Foot … http://bit.ly/acMW3k

  11. Krysia Smyth

    RT @jimhenderson Great blog post from my nephew on David Cameron's cancer anecdote http://tinyurl.com/y7gxcrw #leadershipdebate

  12. Robert Woods

    RT @leftfootfwd: Under the microscope: Cameron's cancer drug anecdote http://bit.ly/bRb578

  13. Sam Lister Times

    RT @wdjstraw: Another anecdote bites the dust. Cam gets it wrong on cancer drug Sutent http://bit.ly/bRb578 (via @leftfootfwd) @BenGoldacre

  14. Malarky67

    @jimhenderson Guardian Bad Science: http://tinyurl.com/27rlpdy has picked up on my Cancer story today: http://bit.ly/bRb578

  15. Stephen

    This story has been picked up on the Guardian now….

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/24/bad-science-evidence-voting

  16. Will the Coalition's cancer drugs policies work? | Left Foot Forward

    […] During the election campaign the Conservative Party frequently highlighted the issue of cancer drug rationing including David Cameron himself during the leaders’ debates. […]

  17. The coalition's cancer muddle | Left Foot Forward

    […] a strong incentive for the drug company to offer a decent NHS-wide price that might be accepted as value for money. Indeed NHS drug prices are generally very […]

  18. Lactogeng Pascil

    Recommendations for a Mesothelioma Lawsuit http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/recommendations-for-a-mesothelioma-lawsuit/

    Mesothelioma Law is there to entitle the individual his lawful rights http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-law-is-there-to-entitle-the-individual-his-lawful-rights/

    Mesothelioma Law Company how to select the best one for you http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-law-company-how-to-select-the-best-one-for-you/

    Mesothelioma Attorneys your key to rights and compensation http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-attorneys-your-key-to-rights-and-compensation/

    Mesothelioma Attorney and Mesothelioma law company are the solutions to the suffering http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-attorney-and-mesothelioma-law-company-are-the-solutions-to-the-suffering/

    Get paid with help from asbestos law firms http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/get-paid-with-help-from-asbestos-law-firms/

    discovering a law company in dallas for your Mesothelioma case http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/discovering-a-law-company-in-dallas-for-your-mesothelioma-case/

    Boston Mesothelioma Lawyers http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/boston-mesothelioma-lawyers/

    Asbestos Lawyer how you can discover an excellent one http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/asbestos-lawyer-how-you-can-discover-an-excellent-one/

    Asbestos law firms http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/asbestos-law-firms/

    Mesothelioma law contemporary day threats including Mesothelioma exposure http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-law-contemporary-day-threats-including-mesothelioma-exposure/

    Mesothelioma law firm battling for your compensation http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-law-firm-battling-for-your-compensation/

    Mesothelioma law firm http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-law-firm/

    Mesothelioma law companies summary of a lawsuit http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-law-companies-summary-of-a-lawsuit/

    Mesothelioma attorney discover out your possibilities of successful your mesothelioma lawsuit http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/mesothelioma-attorney-discover-out-your-possibilities-of-successful-your-mesothelioma-lawsuit/

    How to select the right Mesothelioma law firm http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/how-to-select-the-right-mesothelioma-law-firm/

    How to choose a Mesothelioma lawyer http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/how-to-choose-a-mesothelioma-lawyer/

    Discovering the right Mesothelioma Attorney—- http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/discovering-the-right-mesothelioma-attorney/

    Best Mesothelioma lawyers a saving elegance for Mesothelioma victims http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/best-mesothelioma-lawyers-a-saving-elegance-for-mesothelioma-victims/

    All about Mesothelioma lawyer http://greatmesotheliomalawfirm.com/all-about-mesothelioma-lawyer/

Leave a Reply